One_Honest_Dude

joined 1 year ago
[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if they reschedule it it is no longer federal illegal. States that want to ban it would still have their laws but removing it from banned substance lists would also remove the federal road blocks to legal use; banking rules, insurance, etc. It should be decheduled entirely and then legislators, state and federal, could decide legality.

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

the US really is a gibberish shitshow.

I'm in the US and I think it's this one.

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One of the first things Trump did was release $1 billion in military aid to Egypt that had beenb frozen due to Sisi's human rights abuses. He was also one of Trump's first guests at the Whitehouse after he was elected.

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Correct, which is why trump has been trying to have his state charges changed to federal charges.

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why would trump being immune protect Jeff Clark from consequences? The supreme Court didn't even state that what Trump did was legal, only that he's immune from prosecution.

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

As expected, but someone has to say it. 🤣😓

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

This is very misleading. All she said is that she would sign the border bill that had been negotiated and had broad bipartisan support before Trump had the Senate kill it to try to help his campaign. That bill extends the timeline for spending the 600 million already appropriated for the wall under the trump administration. This is a far cry from Trump's 18 billion wall spanning the entire border. I don't support this bill but I think it is dishonest to claim she has changed her position, merely accepting what was negotiated in Congress and her liking other provisions in it.

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Housing - 10,050 Medicare average cost per beneficiary (2022) - 15,730

31065-10050-15730 = 5285 remaining for meals, three meals everyday for a year would be $4.83 per meal, low but doable. This assumes the government will be providing everything with no contribution from the individual. Lack of housing is probably the largest impediment to employment, no address or id for job apps, nowhere to shower and be clean, have clean clothes, etc. Addiction is another issue but safe stable housing would be a major help in getting clean as well. So some number of these people will be able to get back on track and start contributing to themselves and society at large.

I realized after typing I found Medicare instead of Medicaid, it varies by state but average cost per enrollee is 8651, so another 1400 is available in the equation.

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

My guess is they used his involvement to sell it to distributors. It says they have already made deals for international markets, likely getting more than they would have with a different actor.

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It’s one thing to have a director’s cut because of studio meddling of the theatrical release, and it’s another to have one despite the director having creative control of both versions. What’s the point?

In this case he wanted to do an R rated film but the studio wanted PG13. They agreed that the first release would be PG13 he would also get to make his R rated cut for later release.

view more: next ›