I'm surprised there wasn't a bigger drop during Covid.
MountingSuspicion
joined 2 years ago
I swear to god if they run Pete (which seems like he's gearing up for it) I will explode from sheer rage. Pete has nothing to offer but more of the same. I hate hearing people pretend like he has a chance. It's absolute delusion and is exactly the problem with all the other democrats. He is uninspiring and we will loose and it will be our fault.
Medicare for all who want it. Lmaoooooooooo. So upsetting. I've never heard a democrat say something more cringe and I watched Hillary say Pokémon go to the polls live.
Your main point that dropping out does not equate to being a bad candidate is valid though.
Honestly. It feels like they didn't even bother to focus group this. I don't know how execs didn't have an immediate understanding it was a bad idea, but even if for whatever reason they couldn't immediately tell, they didn't bother to check with anyone else. I don't know a single person who thought it made sense branding wise. They could've asked five people on the street and saved millions of dollars. Plus, I had HBO for a bit so they have my email (spam email), every once in a while I'd login and see emails from Max and think it's like a phishing scam because that's a pretty common name, but no, turns out they were just emails from HBO lol.
I couldn't agree more. Things might have turned out similarly regardless, but there's a non-zero chance that without it the patriot act, the second bush term, and the following collapse of civil liberties would not have occurred, or at least would have taken more time or a different path. Sometimes you see people say al-Qaeda won that day and though I don't think anyone really won, sine it and the aftermath were devastating worldwide, they certainly had some of their aims accomplished.
I try not to mention brands explicitly, but plenty of people seem to do that. I think a big issue is that brands have become verbs. People don't search for information, they google it. They don't buy things, they prime them. They don't watch generic TV they watch Netflix. I have a family member that calls all sneakers Nikes. I think branding has become "better" and marketers are making their brands an important part of the activity itself. It might just be a passive culture shift due to this difference.
I'm not acting like there's only one country in the world and nothing in my comment would suggest I think the US was omnipotent and wonderful, unless you think racism and Islamophobia and turning against other countries is somehow wonderful.
If I see a post that talks about how too many parents are giving their kids tablets, my first thought is not "there are so many places where no one even owns a tablet, stop generalizing". This is a random meme, not a manifesto on global issues. The term millennial isn't even used globally and often different countries will have different ideas of what a generation is and what to call it. In South Africa some "millennials" would be part of the "born-free generation", in Northern Ireland you might call them "Peace Babies", in china "Post 90s". Terms from the US might make their way abroad, but "baby boomers" certainly was not a phenomenon in every country. Getting upset that someone is using a US made term in a meme in English on a site where the plurality of the traffic is from the US is a weird choice. I don't know if Ukrainians consider themselves millennials but it seems like people who did at least some sociology have made the following divisions: the Soviet generation (age 60 years and older), who were 30 years old when the Soviet Union collapsed; second, the transition generation (45–59 years old), who were educated and launched in the Soviet Union; third, the post-Soviet generation (30–44 years old), who were educated in independent Ukraine and have little memory of the USSR; and fourth, the young generation (18–29 years old), who have no memory or experience of the USSR.
Again, I don't know what is the most popular term in Ukraine, but it's clear that generations mean different things to different people and using millennials in a US centric way is pretty standard. It's not our place to act like we can use our sociology names for social cohorts globally and have that be reasonable. So if anything the use of the term to describe US sentiments (or other countries that feel like their experience aligns closely enough) is a good way to honor other countries and cultures agency and autonomy.
Then why are they flocking to the military and the church instead of mutual aid organizations and general interest groups?
Plenty of people (including young men) want hope and community, and are finding it through means that don't involve violence and suppression. If you don't support violence and suppression on some level, you won't seek community with people who do.
Does economics play a factor? Sure, but the other commenter said "many" not all or even the majority, and there's little evidence to the contrary showing that these men are actually interested in patriotism and godliness and not the other aspects of these outlets. They don't want to give up their vices, they just like that some churches say they should own women. They don't want to protect their country and its values, they want to commit acts of violence. Maybe they feel this way because of the current economic and social climate, but acting as though they don't feel this way is naive.
I don't know how old you were during 9/11 but it was an awful time to grow up. Out of nowhere you were being bombarded with messages of hate towards of nebulous group of "others". The country overnight decided that unabashed Islamophobia was in vogue (previously there was still hate but not as outright). Think the Asian hate during covid but ramped up to 11. Your country was changing (at least from a young persons perspective) and all the sudden our allies were not to be trusted (remember freedom fries?). The US became embroiled in what was ostensibly a forever war for no reason.
It wasn't the worst thing, but people were going to war again and that was very clear and very scary. The financial crashes probably take the spotlight since they affected a lot more Americans directly and it's possible that everyone knew someone who lost or had to leave their home, but 9/11 changed the country in unmistakable ways and it was scary to watch and then have to witness the fallout without really having much understanding and certainty no agency. I don't think the meme is saying all of these things are equally bad. Just pointing out that these were major events and possible inflection points in history that didn't break in favor of justice.
I hate to stress a point, but Bush v Gore was 2000, and Bush elected two Supreme Court judges that would then go on to decide citizens United under a Bush appointed chief justice.
I don't know if things definitely would've gone differently, but I imagine there would at least be different judges in place.
I'm happy to trace this issue back to the founding fathers, but Bush v Gore was the beginning of the end in my opinion.
Regan was awful, but how did Nixon get elected before that and so on? At a certain point there's a direct line between compromises made during the drafting of the constitution and where we are today. I don't know where we can realistically draw the line. They saw the problems back then, even warning against two party systems.
What happened with Sanders was just evidence of an already compromised system, and thinking about it now I don't know that much would've been different. The Trump apparatus was already firmly in place.
Oh lol. I thought it was clear but now that I reread it it's not. I'll edit in that it's not what I was looking for. I think it is exactly what it was billed as but I would not have seen it by myself. It felt more down to earth and that's not what I go to superhero media for. I want big moves like watching the unraveling of a superhero mind controlling an entire town or the decimation of the home of gods.
People will probably disagree, but I think this would've been great as a show and falcon and winter soldier would have been better as a movie. I am not a fan of Bucky in general though so I think I might just misunderstand what people want out of the character.
Not sure if this is a joke, but I'm sorry if you're legitimately struggling with this.
I was figuring job loss leading to less income, plus stay at home orders leading to less ability to meet/congregate with people supplying/using, plus change in supply lines possibly leading to difficulties acquiring or at least a rise in prices. That plus a decrease in possible other stressors, time for introspection, and time to get and stay clean without concern for other priorities seemed to make it a good time to try to quit. I'm not really involved in that so I don't know though. Just speculation. I know people who quit smoking and drinking, but that's obviously very different. That was mostly because they didn't smoke/drink alone so they were able to go a bit without and decided to keep it that way.