Jank

It often appears that way in children, but obviously isn't an actual indicator of intelligence.

ADD discussions are full of the self diagnosed and people who are in wildly different positions on the ADD scale. Naturally a lot of people look for identity and it's a thing to latch onto.

So you were told you were smart constantly as a kid, or you have some ADD features and get the whole "ADD is my super power" people.

Some with ADD also get that impulsivity issue around other people and make themselves look like bigger jackasses than they generally are.

Just out for a rip.

Still saving up for that six disc changer. Gonna be sweet. Of course, someone has to sit in my S10's jump seat.

All that performance enhancing Geritol.

I don't think you're considering the demographic.

as usual everyone having guns isn't like makeing the place more safe.

If anything it's more like injecting an unknown number of dangerous wildcards into an already dangerous situation.

Genuine question, how accurate are Tazers? If the partner was in a headlock, was there any risk of tazering the wrong person while the gum was more accurate?

Speaking independently of the story- Not very by comparison to firearms. Something like 50% less accurate. There's also the issue that tasers will not always incapacitate someone. That's a gamble if someone has a weapon and the range to use it.

Part of the rationale in using a firearm is the need to body someone before they can use a weapon where non lethal methods are just not as effective.

Of course, when you investigate yourself you will always find that you used your firearm in the appropriate situational context.

I don't think anything could possibly chide him more than simply forgetting and continuing to call it Twitter.

You're looking at an audiobook as if it's only a method of distributing the contents of a book, but a human conveying a story is a performance. Those performances have artistic merit. Sometimes more, sometimes less, different take aways for different listeners, however it's an inherent symptom of a human being sharing something.

This is where it gets important to remember that Machine Learning isn't actually AI. It cannot make decisions or have accidents outside of mistakes made by the developers. It is not intelligent, it is a computer program.

Yes, I have. And I don't want to choose every detail of a performance no matter how simple.

I want to hear a performance independent of my own experience. I want to hear something that I didn't know I wanted.

AI can only show you an elaborate mixture of the data it was trained on and a set of instructions. It cannot make decisions, iterate on experiences, or have creatively beneficial mistakes like a human does.

You don't use a knife on a baguette, you freak. You tear a piece of. Ever hear of breaking bread?

Fuck's sake, heathens.

You're telling me not to rip a wicked funny fart and sock her hard in the shoulder when she's too much of a panty waist to laugh? Pfsh.

Some guys have no idea how to talk to chicks.