IndictEvolution

joined 1 year ago
[–] IndictEvolution@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Yes I guess I skipped over that, sorry. I would, however, still argue it would not make sense to have that many redundant humans, and that wellness is hard to measure since society does not allow people to express how they truly feel about things.

[–] IndictEvolution@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Definitely not poor people. I think requiring a license to have children would not be a bad idea. I would not acknowledge reproduction as a human right, but instead as a form of rape.

I am also not bothered by infanticide as long as it is done humanely, and assuming both parents do not want the child.

[–] IndictEvolution@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can probably fit like 10 people in my house if I tried hard enough, so I guess that's what I should do, right? Quantity over quality, right? We just can't have enough suffering.

[–] IndictEvolution@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Reducing birthrates is not genocide. As long as the population continues to increase, human life will be more and more devalued as we continue to choose quantity over quality of life because of a DNA delusion.

[–] IndictEvolution@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Can't we all just agree 8 billion people is silly? Think about how much of it is just completely redundant. The main focus really should be massive population reduction.

Edit: Also, no, I don't mean killing off anyone, just reducing birth rates will do fine. We know even just a simple high school education reduces birth rates.