GuyFleegman

joined 1 year ago
[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ken Kocienda, the engineer who led the team that created the original iPhone keyboard and predictive text system, wrote a book titled “Creative Selection: Inside Apple's Design Process During the Golden Age of Steve Jobs.” So there’s at least one real engineer for you who speaks highly of Jobs.

They aren’t nameless. They write books and go on podcasts, their thoughts on Jobs are available to us. Plenty of them praise Jobs for driving them to do their best work.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

Right, I said it's "not bad," hardly a ringing endorsement. It had some good ideas and concepts but it also has a lot of flaws, which is why it's quite unfortunate that it's the best Discovery ever managed.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 10 points 10 months ago

It’s not false advertising because it did everything it was advertised to do in the introductory demo when it went on sale six months later. Google is the one faking their demos.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Right? Put Lorca on the front of my list to round out all four seasons. The outsiders carry the cast.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My problem with season 4 wasn't that it was slow, but that it was uninspired and by-the-numbers. I had worked out that the DMA was a "stepping on an anthill" situation by... episode 4, maybe? 5 at the latest. So then I got to watch one of the oldest tropes in sci-fi unfold for 8 more episodes, played completely straight. Yawn.

I'd rather watch the B-plot from S01E06 of Babylon 5 to experience that particular story again. That way I'd be done in an hour.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

Yes, exactly. Season 1 knew what it wanted to be. When it was over, I remember thinking "alright, not bad, I'm excited to watch this show grow the beard."

But it never did. In retrospect, Season 1 is the strongest season the show had to offer. Each subsequent season got a little worse as plots got more confusing, themes got more muddled, and no breakout characters emerged to carry the show through an abundance of narrative turmoil and worldbuilding strangeness. But above all else, seasons 3 and 4 are just boring. I don't care about the crew or their mission. The most interesting characters are consistently the outsiders: Pike, Vance, Rillak. I'll be watching season 5, but mostly out of a sense of obligation and morbid curiosity.

As much as I like SNW, it's still not quite the show I've been waiting since 2005 for: seven curious officers on a ship called Enterprise set in the mid-25th century. I worry that SNW has robbed us of the opportunity to see the classic formula set in the immediate post-TNG era... even though that seems to be what season three of Picard was explicitly setting up.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We all know the bubbles will still be green

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

account from "An instance dedicated to nature and science"

asked to provide evidence for claims

refuses

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cullen

Seems like he's talking about... Twilight?

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website -4 points 11 months ago

It doesn’t. The episodes just get longer and more boring as the show progresses. The cancellation isn’t exactly a mystery.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

""""loudly declare""""

Adira tells Stamets their pronouns, and Stamets says "okay" approvingly. That's it. That's the full extent of what you are calling a "big deal."

You understand that even in a society where everyone is allowed to "just be," accidental misgendering is still going to happen and corrections will still need to be communicated, right? Marco misgendered Nico on their first appearance, so Nico must have corrected him. You are effectively arguing that enby representation is only acceptable if actual conversations about gender occur off-screen.

 
 
 
 
 
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by GuyFleegman@startrek.website to c/quarks@startrek.website
 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›