GunnarRunnar

joined 2 years ago
[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

How the children obtained guns remains a part of the ongoing investigation, according to the Sheriff’s office.

I bet it's one of the parents or a close relative that didn't properly store their gun.

When are they going to start throwing people in jail for this?

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

I'd just rather them have an actual point than just complaints .Like how in their understanding are the instance runners in the clear when it comes to copyright laws. Like an actual point. Or how are they going to help the instance if there were to be legal trouble.

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Lmao thought police is fucking sending me a bill for breaking the copyright law!!

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

What? What's narcissistic about that comment. Abuse -- maybe since that was antagonistic language and it just might be your first day on the internet.

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Talking about finger pointing without actually breaking down their argument doesn't seem constructive and makes you sound like op hit home with their description.

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

By being filthy rich and owning a lot of the company?

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Yeah too bad that idiot at the top hasn't been thrown out like in any normal company and the company is using resources to accommodate his whims.

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Bitching about people switching to more dangerous substances makes the case to legalize it, nothing more.

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

How is it ridiculous because like you yourself said they are offering an opinion on the products? And that wasn't the only point they had, it was just one of many and valid criticism.

And it's dumb to call that sloppy editing when the narrative they were trying to build was that they're more trustworthy than other outlets providing same kind of reviews. And that doesn't seem to be the case.

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

It's hard to trust a face with a mouth agape.

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

I wonder if it's as simple as just slowing down the input reading to a human reaction time level. At least my screen seems to take 15 000 inputs at the same time when wet.

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Make some kind of bet between you two. Like offer a nice dinner if you can save some money when going carless. And offer something in return if it's actually more expensive, too.

Talk also about the convenience factor etc, those all matter.

view more: ‹ prev next ›