84
YDI. You went into an explicitly pro-leftist comm to spread anti-leftist perspectives. They literally have site wide rules against this.
Ginja
joined 1 month ago
-49
On the road with an army of 2,000 migrants rushing to America before Trump can retake the White House
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
Right and did I ever post an opinion piece? Is a clickbaity title misinformation?
You're all so quick to focus on something unrelated to the actual issue which is the lyings for the reason of those removals.
And calling a non-opinion piece article an opinion piece before removing it?
That’s not really how it seems like at all.
I have actually spoken with different mods in both World and News and after getting further clarification around what sources are permitted and are not (ex. I can use anything that doesn't fall under the “Questionable” list) it was all resolved long ago.
This is also the only time a post was removed for being an 'opinion' article, yet it's specifically mentioned as a cause for the ban?
It's not due to a "history", and most of my posts are well received such as 'White House says health insurance needs to fully cover condoms, other over-the-counter birth control'
Now how about instead of trying to find any excuse to justify this, you address the points made in my original comment?
reason: Rule 3 - No opinion articles
This is the article, as you can see it is very clearly a news article about a current event and not at all an opinion article.
reason: Misinformation. Two parliament victories out of 650 members is NOT a nightmare for the opposition.
It's a clickbaity title at worst, b ut it is not misinformation. A party losing a swing seat is not a good sign, especially considering Starmers growing unpopularity. This ban was purely a mods opinion, there was no 'misinformation'.
reason: Multiple posting rule violations, especially opinion and misinformation articles. Please read the rules in the sidebar in future.
The mod used these two lies to justify a ban from the community. What point is reading the rules in the sidebar meant to serve if they're not legitimately being enforced?
Thinking about how people trying to blame white men for this don't realize how they're causing exactly this problem.
"It's all your vote"
"Why aren't you supporting us?"
"It's all your vote"
People seriously think this is going to get those who feel that way to come around to them? Honey not vinegar.
26
Keir Starmer branded a 'hypocrite' as Channel migrant death toll rises to new record
(www.express.co.uk)
-43
'Crisis' in UK due to huge number of 'lazy men' who can’t be bothered to work
(www.express.co.uk)
I would never set foot in India.
view more: next ›
You're right, they must all be paid actors! Thousands of paid actors walking and sleeping outdoors, very committed paid actors.