overview for FreedomAdvocate

Woman called a child the N word, then she claimed to be the victim. So far she raised over $150,000 in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The government isn’t invading.

The President of the USA decides if there is an invasion or predatory incursion, that’s the point. Not congress, not you - the president.

Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for in c/technology@lemmy.world

Reddit will tighten verification to keep out human-like AI bots in c/technology@lemmy.world

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How did they bend the knee to musk is what I’m asking.

Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for in c/technology@lemmy.world

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 3 days ago (6 children)

It’s called what it is because of the laws that demand any self driving/automated driving be “supervised” and require regular checks that the driver is paying attention.

You’re essentially saying that Tesla should be made to do something that they’re already doing.

Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for in c/technology@lemmy.world

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No it’s not.

It fully drives itself, but legally you need to “supervise” it. It’s called that because of the laws around driving a car.

Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for in c/technology@lemmy.world

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Companies can say whatever they want in their fine print but it’s not legally binding. If you want to do a class action over this, go for it.

Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for in c/technology@lemmy.world

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They’ve “figured out” lane-keeping - they’re just keeping it reserved for FSD. It’s in FSD. They’re just now flipping to not offer it as a standalone feature, which don’t get me wrong is a shitty move.

Woman called a child the N word, then she claimed to be the victim. So far she raised over $150,000 in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The president does have the power during wartime… which the president doesnt get to decide, congress does.

I don't know how many times it needs to be pointed out to you, because even your own links specifically say it, but you're wrong. It can be invoked during wartime OR when there is an invasion or predatory incursion which is at the discretion of the President. "Or" is the key word here that you don't seem to be understanding.

Congress decides when it is "wartime".

The President decides when there is an ongoing invasion or predatory incursion.

Indian Government orders censoring of accounts on X in c/technology@lemmy.world

X.com blocks access to Ekrem Imamoglu, leader of Turkey political opposition in c/technology@lemmy.world

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Complying with the incumbent to silence opposition is a political decision.

No it's not. Did you even read the linked X Global Affairs post?

Lack of compliance with these orders can lead to severe sanctions, including throttling of the entire platform in Türkiye. X complied with the court order while we challenge the order in court because we believe keeping the platform accessible in Türkiye is vital to supporting freedom of expression and access to information, particularly following natural disasters and other emergencies.

It's not a political decision, it's a legal one. If they don't comply then the entire site can legally be banned from the entire country, for example.