FiskFisk33

joined 1 year ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 58 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I highly doubt that chain of causation to be true. Had people paid more, the producers would still lower their cost base as much as possible, in order to maximize profits.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago

I'm not gonna put my foot down for either side here but, to be completely fair here, so is for example the us dollar.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 6 months ago

no, it costs NaN, now remove NaN from your account...

...oh no

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 6 months ago

Tesla contends that it should have been obvious to LoSavio that his car needed lidar to self-drive and that his car did not have it

So their defence against fraud is that it should have been obvious they were lying? ouch.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

When you castle the king, he's in a quantum-entangled state with the rook!

when one of the kings possible locations are checked you throw a dice to resolve the quantum position

This could actually be an interesting video game idea to explore. You can make quantum moves that get resolved by chance once a possible position is interacted with.

like you make for example three different moves on your turn. chance will decide later which one resolves as true

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

LLM is amazing tech, but holy fuck I can't wait to get out of this bubble. Some of these applications sound like when they put radium in butter in the 50's, because atomic energy was so hype.

view more: ‹ prev next ›