FauxLiving

joined 1 week ago
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 25 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, this guy.

He couldn't have done it, he was spending that time at my house helping me move. You guys were there too, remember?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Now is not the time to sit and think of how education and whatnot should have been. Now is the time to act.

Acting in ignorance is exactly how we got here in the first place.

If you think that acting means attacking the people wearing red hats on social media then you don't understand what is happening, what the sides are and what is at stake.

You're advocating for fighting the other fools while the con man runs away with both of your money.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (9 children)

Because there's an entire alternate reality built by right wing news sources that exist specifically to create confusion and spread misinformation.

It used to be a joke that Fox News was so unaligned with reality. It's less funny now that there is an entire media ecosystem that supports this alternate reality.

This is why you see people thinking that Trump is a great businessman. Because according to everything that they see and hear, he is. They were never equipped with the media literacy to counteract the weaponized psychology that's used to target them with political lies and spin.

By the time any individual encounters reality in a way that is undeniable (like the ex-IRS employee) it's too late.

They're just a tiny voice in an ocean of lies. If they try to talk about their experiences on right-wing social media they'll be labeled as a left-wing plant or banned outright. The right-wing media won't cover their story or repeat their concerns. It'll continue repeating the lies and spin like it always has and that person will finally understand Martin Niemöller's poem.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago

So, the blame is on the company that manufacturers and operates the Dragons. Maybe Musk should call them out...

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

They just drinking some of the residual koolaid that team Trump was pouring into social media to convince left leaning voters, who were never going to vote for him, to throw their votes away.

It's the same tactic they used in 2016 to target black people. They simply put out a lot of fake posts from fake "black people" creating the illusion of a movement of people who refused to vote for Hillary.

The Great Hack is a documentary that covers the Cambridge Analytica scandal and shows them talking about using this exact same tactic in other elections. The former employee said it was like injecting poison into the veins of social media.

The person you're responding to probably doesn't even realize that they're still regurgitating the same nonsense because they think they're living in a world full of other people who agree with them. But that world is artificial and was created to manipulate them.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (17 children)

Your blame is misplaced. You appear think this is the fault of random people who wear different color hats instead of the result of decades of effort by some of the richest people in our society to fundamentally weaken democracy and to create uneducated people that can be manipulated.

You're blaming the other members of your class that are the victims of decades of educational failure and indoctrination instead of the people who knowingly implemented those policies looking for this specific result.

It's a narrow minded and short-sighted way of looking at things; and, in addition, your tribalistic rhetoric only serves to increase the division among the working class further aiding the people who seek to profit from this division.

It's one thing to be frustrated, but ignorance is how we got here and we downvote you because we don't need more ignorance even if it's coming from someone wearing a blue hat instead of a red one.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

They spend a lot to decommission the ships and make them safe. It's just cheaper to buy an old ship and clean it up than to buy a similar amount of other artificial reef materials.

Also, being ships in shallow water, it drives scuba diving tourists as well as creating new locations for recreational fishing.

They're pretty big boons for the local towns.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

They're usually sank in areas that are otherwise uninhabited by corals due to the depth of the water. The wrecks provide surfaces in the light zone which allows corals to grow.

It's entirely new habitat and it provides more breeding sites in the area. Even if it takes wildlife from other areas, the decrease in population in those results in higher breeding rates in those locations due to decreased competition for food and breeding sites. More breeding sites = more breeding and a higher overall population of wildlife over time.

Ecology aside, these sites draw a lot of tourism. They're "shipwrecks" that are in shallow water, often shallow enough that you can experience them while scuba diving, without needing decompression stops. This means that scuba divers can experience wreck diving without the extra complexity of decompression.

There are many of these artificial reefs around Florida and they're very popular dive sites in areas that otherwise would have no similar attractions.

Source: Dated a woman who worked at fish and wildlife, department of marine fisheries and attended the sinking of the Oriskany ( https://www.padi.com/dive-site/united-states-of-america-usa/uss-oriskany/#overview )

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

New people don't realize that Linux is really a soap opera with a small software project attached.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago

Let's say such a change happens and at that time there's a bit of time pressure and the capacity on the rust maintainers is thing for whatever reasons. Will they still happily swallow that change or will they start to discuss if it's really necessary to do that change? And suddenly, the C-maintainer has a political discussion on top of the technical issue they wanted to solve.

This situation could occur even if the code using the API was written in C.

If an API change breaks other downstream kernel code, and that code can't be fixed in time then they have a conversation about pushing the changes to the next build.

In the end, Linus has already chosen to accept the extra development overhead in using Rust. I think this situation was more about a maintainer, who happens to disagree with the Rust inclusion, using their position to create unnecessary friction for other maintainers.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Where's the pre-order link?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, you can't find any copyrighted text inside the model's weights.

view more: next ›