Dimok

joined 1 year ago
[–] Dimok@reddthat.com -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If you think this is dehumanizing, you got some rough lessons when you join the workforce. That being said, I'm not defending it in the least. I just think it's minuscule in the grand scheme of 'bad things a company can do to its workers' and if anything should teach the translators to get it in any future contracts. But then again, I'm in compliance management. I've seen companies discard poultry machines because they had a guard removed and they wanted to hide that from OSHA (and lawyers) to 'improve throughput' that then eventually cut a woman's hand half off, then fire employees who told OSHA who and why the guard was removed. Not getting your name credited on some work, OHTEHNOES THE TRAGEDY!! Fuckin grow up.

[–] Dimok@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

It's funny to me that you think someones point of view differing from yours could be an L. You do realize we can have differing points of view, and I have yet to see an L in mine, right?

[–] Dimok@reddthat.com -5 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Oh nice, internet sarcasm? That's basically the "it's a prank, bro" when you get called out. Nice try though.

[–] Dimok@reddthat.com -4 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Except if there actually is an issue (we still haven't heard from the people affected by this) then this accomplishes next to nothing. If this generation continues to rely on fickle internet FOMO crap instead of, I don't know, actually attempting to solve their problems, nothing is going to get better. We've turned companies into 'internet responders' who care more about their internet image than actually taking care of their workers. If this group of workers is actually affected by this as negatively as the internet feels, then they need to work for change internally in their industry. This is just a shiny thing the internet picked up on before it moves on to the next.

[–] Dimok@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You linked a report with methodology and limits, but did you read it? Traceability assumptions are, first and foremost, assumptions. To assume this agency has all required data points for some news article to claim a percentage on a number there is no way they could know, is...well I already touched on that in my first post.

[–] Dimok@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Taciturnly. They are shy..

[–] Dimok@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

.."the vast majority of illicit fentanyl — close to 90% — is seized at official border crossings" I always take 'news' with a grain of salt when they claim they know a percentage of a total that they absolutely do not. 90% of what, total seized? That sounds about right. They have no clue what the total of illicit fentanyl is.

view more: ‹ prev next ›