BakedCatboy

I tried the .ps one and it worked for me

I hope they get wrecked and the company gets imploded

I wonder if this is related to sync having the same issue. I frequently find threads with 5-10 comments but nothing shows up. I don't have anybody blocked whatsoever and the issue happens on posts from various instances, even my own. Maybe this could be a bug that affects both apps. When I load these threads in browser it looks fine.

I can't wait until the immich photo editor gets enabled and hopefully it eventually duplicates all the google photos editor features because that's the only reason I keep around the google photos app.

You can achieve a similar thing using vlans - usually by default they're isolated but you may add specific rules that allow traffic between vlans if it meets certain criteria (specific ports, specific types of traffic, traffic to or from specific hosts, any combination of those). So yeah you can imagine client isolation being like having each client on their own vlan - except without needing a different subnet for each client.

To add to the other reply, client isolation is about controlling whether an ap, switch, or router willingly sends traffic between clients. Because of that, it doesn't kick in if you listen to packets over the air before they've been received by an AP. For that kind of security you need a wifi specific security measure - which I think "enhanced open" is what you'd be interested in. It allows you to have an open passwordless wifi but it generates temporary encryption keys for each connected client, then the rest is as if it was using WPA, so that you don't need to enter a password but your traffic gets encrypted and protected from anyone else listening in on the WiFi.

If you combine both then you should have a network where each device is isolated both over the air and from a routing perspective so that each device only sees an Internet connection and no other devices.

Ooh grouped notifications are great!

Probably because he already did an nft collection apparently, according to the article.

I use a nuc10i7fnkn and since transcoding is almost entirely done using the dedicated quicksync hardware in the CPU you don't end up actually using the CPU much. So I'm sure it would work on an older generation or the i5 version. I don't know much about the N100 but it looks like it would be very capable. Supposedly it boosts to 3+GHz and it's a 10nm node compared to my NUCs 14nm. But the GPU has the same number of execution units so I'm not sure if the quicksync transcoding performance is that different. I saw someone mention 3 simultaneous 4K transcodes and I think I got about that much on mine. Generally for quick sync performance you just compare the Intel hd or uhd graphics model (like 630, 730, uhd, etc) and the number of execution units and that should correlate to the performance. Also check the Wikipedia page for quicksync for codec compatibility (under the Hardware decoding and encoding section), but anything recent will handle most stuff you'd need: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Quick_Sync_Video

I actually run my arrstack on a Synology, it has official support for docker and docker-compose. Granted I do have a higher powered model (the DS1621xs+) but most of the arrstack is fairly low power friendly.

You can also get away with running Plex on a nas but I would only do it if 1. Your nas has a quick sync supported CPU and you get that enabled properly or 2. You go the direct streaming only / no transcoding setup - which means checking the codec support for all client devices and either only downloading exactly the supported codecs or pre-transcoding everything.

What I do is actually run Plex/JF on a separate nuc and point it at the nas using a network mount. Just don't use a network mount for the Plex app database (maybe same applies to JF too), just mount the media files itself. Running Plex and having it access the DB over a network mount is a big no no for various reasons.

Hmm my first thought is that it might be the owner's truck.

I'm glad to clear it up! It's a super powerful tool, and I still occasionally skip the automation and just use it for manual searches since it reduces that process to a single click to search all configured torrent sites and a single click to download and have the rest automatically handled.

Before when I was visiting friends and wanted to quickly add something to plex, I used to need remote access to my torrent client and separate remote access to my NAS filesystem to move/rename files when downloads finish which was a really manual process. Now all I need is the reverse-proxied sonarr/radarr UI since it handles moving/copying/renaming on download completion - and while the UI isn't mobile-first, it's very usable and feels less error-prone than moving/renaming files remotely using a file explorer app.