ApeNo1

joined 2 years ago
[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I suspect Trump probably did.

[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The rules were updated in the 90s to allow wise cracking bunnies, ducks and cats with lisps, tweety birds, pigs wearing no pants, and coyotes with an online purchasing addiction from ACME.

[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Two rights make a wrong

[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I was made for lovin' you, m’lady
You were made for lovin' me
And I can't get enough of you, m’lady
Can you get enough of me?

[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Putting aside the fact that I doubt the size of the mummified bird is regulation, the way the cat is hanging onto the ring elbows straight and for such an extended time, I would say it is debatable whether this slam dunk is legal or not. This arguably could be classified as taunting resulting in a potential technical foul.