Wow, I guess humans and LLMs aren't so different after all!
200fifty
joined 2 years ago
Psst, check the usernames of the people in this thread!
RationalWiki is an index maintained by the Rationalist community
Lies and slander! I get why he'd assume this based on the name, but it would be pretty funny if the rationalists were responsible for the rational wiki articles on Yudkowsky et al, since iirc they're pretty scathing
"I know not with what technology GPT-6 will be built, but GPT-7 will be built with sticks and stones" -Albert Einstein probably
is this trying to say "discrimination against racists is the real racism"? ... Would that be "racismism"?
this reads like someone googled a list of gen z slang and then threw it in a blender with a bunch of weird race-science memes. who is this for
I think the only acceptable response to whoever is responsible for it is a highly aggressive "touch grass"
I think they were responding to the implication in self's original comment that LLMs were claiming to evaluate code in-model and that calling out to an external python evaluator is 'cheating.' But actually as far as I know it is pretty common for them to evaluate code using an external interpreter. So I think the response was warranted here.
That said, that fact honestly makes this vulnerability even funnier because it means they are basically just letting the user dump whatever code they want into eval() as long as it's laundered by the LLM first, which is like a high-school level mistake.
Look, you gotta forgive this guy for coming up with an insane theory that doesn't make sense. After all, his brain was poisoned by testosterone, so his thinking skills have atrophied. An XXL hat size can only do so much, you know.
They need the rationalist musical cannons for the upcoming performance of the Rationalist 1812 Overture
If twitter did get put on the blockchain after Elon bought it, it really would be "X on blockchain"... ba dum tshh
I beg your pardon?