200fifty

joined 1 year ago
[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 8 points 6 months ago

Wow, I guess humans and LLMs aren't so different after all!

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Psst, check the usernames of the people in this thread!

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

RationalWiki is an index maintained by the Rationalist community

Lies and slander! I get why he'd assume this based on the name, but it would be pretty funny if the rationalists were responsible for the rational wiki articles on Yudkowsky et al, since iirc they're pretty scathing

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"I know not with what technology GPT-6 will be built, but GPT-7 will be built with sticks and stones" -Albert Einstein probably

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

is this trying to say "discrimination against racists is the real racism"? ... Would that be "racismism"?

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

this reads like someone googled a list of gen z slang and then threw it in a blender with a bunch of weird race-science memes. who is this for

I think the only acceptable response to whoever is responsible for it is a highly aggressive "touch grass"

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think they were responding to the implication in self's original comment that LLMs were claiming to evaluate code in-model and that calling out to an external python evaluator is 'cheating.' But actually as far as I know it is pretty common for them to evaluate code using an external interpreter. So I think the response was warranted here.

That said, that fact honestly makes this vulnerability even funnier because it means they are basically just letting the user dump whatever code they want into eval() as long as it's laundered by the LLM first, which is like a high-school level mistake.

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Look, you gotta forgive this guy for coming up with an insane theory that doesn't make sense. After all, his brain was poisoned by testosterone, so his thinking skills have atrophied. An XXL hat size can only do so much, you know.

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

They need the rationalist musical cannons for the upcoming performance of the Rationalist 1812 Overture

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 17 points 7 months ago

If twitter did get put on the blockchain after Elon bought it, it really would be "X on blockchain"... ba dum tshh

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

"You’ll also soon be able to test multimodal Meta AI on our Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses."

Now this is interesting. I've been thinking for some time now that traditional computer/smartphone interfaces are on the way out for all but a few niche applications.

Instead, everyone will have their own AI assistant, which you'll interact with naturally the same way as you interact with other people. Need something visual? Just ask for the latest stock graph for MSFT for example.

God, I hope not. Maybe it's just me, but this sounds insanely annoying? It kind of reminds me of the objection I've seen to the metaverse, where it's actually a more inefficient way to do stuff, so it doesn't make sense to imagine it replacing the text-based internet.

Like, I'm not even a fan of smartphones these days, but surely in a world where you could only access information via yelling at your smart glasses, the invention people would be crying out for would be a way to use it silently with your hands, with a screen you could use to easily show it to other people...?

view more: ‹ prev next ›