It's a veritable paradigm shift. Just think of the synergy.
200fifty
joined 1 year ago
Well, you know, you don't want to miss out! You don't want to miss out, do you? Trust me, everyone else is doing this hot new thing, we promise. So you'd better start using it too, or else you might get left behind. What is it useful for? Well... it could make you more productive. So you better get on board now and, uh, figure out how it's useful. I won't tell you how, but trust me, it's really good. You really should be afraid that you might miss out! Quick, don't think about it so much! This is too urgent!
The winning votes will become investments into the post, binding the CONTENT_EXCRECATOR to CREATE_THE_CONTENT and based on some configurable metric (post score, ad revenue etc.) the investment will accrue dividends
I'm in, but only if this part is handled by fractionalizing an NFT linking to the original post on your custom blockchain
Ars technica comments consistently seem to have the worst takes on ai art I've ever seen, it's nuts
The industry is still learning how to even use the tech.
Just like blockchain, right? That killer app's coming any day now!
as someone who never really understood The Big Deal With SPAs (aside from, like, google docs or whatever) i'm at least taking solace in the fact that like a decade later people seem to be coming around to the idea that, wait, this actually kind of sucks
“We want to make sure that you see great content, that you’re posting great content, and that you’re interacting with the community,” he says.
I feel like using the phrase "great content" unironically is sort of a tell that someone has no idea what makes 'content' 'great' in the first place
Relatedly (and relevant to this article) I feel like the funniest part of the whole AI bubble has been executives repeatedly unwittingly revealing that they could be replaced by a simple computer program
🎶 everybody wants to rule the world 🎶
Yud’s brilliant response is that this makes no sense to describe this as trauma, because you don’t get traumatized by physics class, right?
Isn't this literally formally fallacious? "There exist non-traumatizing true things" doesn't imply "all true things are non-traumatizing."
Ordinarily I'm not one to harp on logical fallacies, but come on Yudkowsky, you're supposed to be Mr. Rational!
this is long and meandering on purpose
Well, at least they admit it.
I was gonna say... good old
qa....q 20@adoes the job just fine thanks :p