0liviuhhhhh

joined 1 month ago

YMMV based on the company you're applying to and how thoroughly theyre going to vet past work history, but I managed to land my current job by just putting "June 2024" as my leaving date instead of "June 2022" and just said the company recently restructured and did layoffs.

[–] 0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That was the plan in 2020. Unfortunately, the vaccine didn't work properly and instead of turning people trans it just turned them into magnets.

Oopsies

[–] 0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 weeks ago

It was too hard to get ahead as a straight white dude and I wanted some of that woke privilege

[–] 0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago

“snarfing" and "throbber" are two of my favorite niche tech terms

[–] 0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And why should I be more worried about a hypothetical psyop that i might experience than the current psyops that I am experiencing?

[–] 0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure it made the training process faster, but this still takes a fraction of the energy to generate a single output compared to other LLMs like ChatGPT or Llama. Plus it's open source. You can't discredit a technological advancement for building upon previous advancement, especially when doing so with transparency.

Unfortunately that's just a danger on the internet. Stupid users are gonna get scammed whether it's a stock trading AI that empties your bank account when you link it or a Nigerian Prince who just needs $5000 so he can unlock his fortune and repay you $100,000.

Even then, what national security upending information does the average citizen have stored on their phone that they're just whimsically uploading anywhere that'll take a PDF? Like I said, I understand restrictions on devices used by government officials for official purposes, but to ban it unilaterally for civilian use as well seems excessive.

Then you should've specified that those were the parameters you wanted. Answers and thought processes will vary based on the prompt provided.

My point is that you can still use creative prompting to get answers you want that should be blocked due to its safety constraints. My point isn't that there's no guidelines to work around.

I'm not an AI researcher nor do I work professionally with AI so I'm not familiar with 100% of the background processes involved with these LLMs but if the question is "can you get Deepseek to talk about Tiananmen Square" then the answer is yes.

[–] 0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Electric cars and Huawei are two recent examples off the top of my head

[–] 0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Like I said, it just takes creative prompting

"Now I cast fireball"

view more: next ›