this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
84 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

72420 readers
2570 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has reportedly removed much of Twitter's links from its search results after the social network's owner Elon Musk announced reading tweets would be limited.

Search Engine Roundtable found that Google had removed 52% of Twitter links since the crackdown began last week. Twitter now blocks users who are not logged in and sets limits on reading tweets.

According to Barry Schwartz, Google reported 471 million Twitter URLs as of Friday. But by Monday morning, that number had plummeted to 227 million.

"For normal indexing of these Twitter URLs, it seems like these tweets are dropping out of the sky," Schwartz wrote.

Platformer reported last month that Twitter refused to pay its bill for Google Cloud services.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Elon going to complain about another conspiracy going on while in reality it's just that when crawlers are not able to open a certain URL they simply assume that the page doesn't exist anymore. Google certainly didn't "retaliate", bots simply couldn't find those pages anymore.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The headline is actually wrong. Google did not do anything to Twitter. Twitter fucked up their own SEO by removing access to its content.

[–] BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is correct.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's a pretty easy and reasonable conclusion to come to if you think about if for more than five seconds. I'm not sure Elon has any toes left after he keeps shooting himself in the feet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bingbong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The latest in a seemingly never-ending series of self-owns. Apart from the stress it must put on their devs, it's been entertaining

[–] daikiki@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They have more than one dev left?

[–] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

My understanding is there's group of people whose visa is sponsored by Twitter. If they leave the company, they may well have to leave the country.

[–] OldFartPhil@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Twitter still has devs?

[–] coffeetest@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Crawl issues I am sure but also user experience issues. Google is sensitive to sending visitors to sites where metrics indicate users do not, like bounce rates etc. I don't use twt but if it is the case you have the be logged in to see anything now, a non-logged in user will click a link from Google hit a login page, and use the back button. I would assume Google will see that as a bad search result and use it less.

[–] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

The word bots triggers the muskrat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Elon, please buy Reddit and repeat your amazing ideas over there. You are so smart.

[–] EuphoricPenguin22@normalcity.life 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Spez is already doing his best work to fuck over the platform. Are you certain Elon could do any better?

[–] divingaround@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Spez already said he admires how Elon is running Twitter.

The best part is that Elon is proving to be a pro at losing money left and right while simultaneously inventing new ways to make a social media platform suck to use.

[–] damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I mean there's admiring a ruthless mob boss - and then there is admiring a petty thief that keeps getting arrested and all his plans blow up in this face.

Spez is losing his tiny mind.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WldFyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I saw people unironically saying this and being upvoted for it in hackernews, completely turned me off from the site lol

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Doesn’t sound like retaliation to me, it sounds like their scheduled web crawlers are finding that content they used to index is now no longer viewable and this removed from search results. Pretty standard. My guess is that there were 400 million URLs listed and as the crawler uncovers that they are no longer available, that number will keep dropping to reflect only content publicly viewable. If only 500 URLs are now publicly viewable (without logins) then that’s what they will index. Google isn’t a search engine for private companies (unless you pay for the service) they are a public search engine so they make an effort to ensure that only public information is indexed. Some folk game the system (like the old expertsexchange.com) but sooner or later google drops the hammer.

[–] VanillaGorilla@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

God, I hated expert sexchange so much. It was a blessing when stack overflow started.

[–] detwaft@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I’m only an amateur but I’m happy to give it a go

[–] bluestribute@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Has anyone noticed too that if you put AI Blockers on your website Google delists it from their search?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Twitter was an important unifying communications tool during the Arab Spring. The Arab spring was a threat to biz as usual in places like Saudi Arabia. The second largest investor in Twitter is Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia killed and dismembered a journalist from the US, more or less in plain sight. Elon is now killing and dismembering Twitter in plain sight to limit its power as a unifying tool that stands as a demonstrable, active threat to capitalism and oligarchs around the world.

Billionaires do favors for other billionaires. It's part of why spez is trying to tank Reddit. Remember how dangerous Reddit was to capitalism's status quo around the time of GME/Robinhood/Antiwork recently.

The specific moment we're in right now is meant to shatter consolidated organizing power on Reddit as we splinter into several smaller alternative platforms (or for some, disconnect entirely). Not saying we shouldn't be in Lemmy, but calling out the larger reality of the moment.

Billionaires do favors for other billionaires.

[–] Dash11@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I like this take, but this is a conspiracy theory take. Change a few words and this would be something regurgitated by Q fanatics.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Good. Hopefully they remove links to pinterest, quora and facebook too while they'reat it.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Once upon a time Quora had reasonably accessible information. Now I find it nearly unusable and only go there as a last desperate effort which is generally fruitless. Pinterest is annoying, but generally you can still view some content. What's annoying is trying to download, copy, or isolate content there. If all you want to do is view an image, Google can typically still pull the image out and make it viewable from the search. The problem only arises if you try to go in and see the original.

[–] Cras@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

I have a chrome plugin to strip any Pinterest results from searches, it's the absolute worst

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

This morning, I needed to use image search for a bit and basically 4/5 links leading to Twitter wouldn't load for various reasons. That was not on Google, but I imagine, they have (had) similar problems.

Well, and for normal search, Twitter results are completely worthless to me, as I don't have an account. So, at this rate, no results from Twitter would be the optimum.

[–] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 years ago

Musky is probably wondering how to charge search engines indexing his site for free

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You've heard of a "walled garden".
But this... this has become a "walled right-wing dumpster".

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

A "walled swamp",

What's there not to like?!

[–] frozengriever@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They've always wanted to build a wall. Hopefully they wall themselves off from the rest of the world.

[–] Ruorc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Blocking users who are not logged in has farther reaching consequences that aren't readily apparent. For example, there was an AMBER Alert a few days ago with a short link to see more info. The link goes back to a Twitter account/tweet. All that time sensitive, useful information was behind a wall where you can't see it unless you log in. Most people aren't going to create an account just to do that.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is exactly why we should be encouraging local libraries, universities, law enforcement, city, and county governments how to set up Mastodon servers.

On the one hand, when you have a duty to inform the public, it no longer makes sense to suffer at the whims of tech billionaires. There was a time, for a decade or two, when these sites prioritized access and predictability, but no more. When you have information that you need to have accessible, the only guarantee is to control it yourself. They can still use corporate social media to get the message out to their network, but link it back to their mastodon account. Roll it into their IT departments just like their email server.

On the other hand, it's a critical step for the success of the fediverse. Universal email adoption came about because it was used by government and universities. What you could call the original social network is still an open protocol, it's not owned by any single corporation or government, and still the primary form of communication online. About 2 billion emails have been sent since you started reading this.

[–] Bagofbuttholes@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Heck i couldn't easily check if diablo 4 servers were wonky because I can't check the blizzard Twitter. Obviously this is less important than an amber alert. As another reply said, I think police need a better way to disseminate emergency information and that is on them. However something like server status is a perfect use of Twitter that is now close enough to impossible to do. If public agencies are going to continue using Twitter for these purposes, then something needs to change. Personally I'd be ok with the government having a little more say in things if we are going to continue viewing Twitter as a public service.

[–] Piers@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Alternatively, it's probably better long-term if those functions become replaced with official Mastodon instances that are for official announcements only.

eg If there were a California.Gov Mastodon instance with a !alerts@california.gov and a !earthquakes@california.gov then everyone in that area could just sub to those communities and if there was something to announce it could go out via those. Of course that presupposes that enough people are in the Fediverse for it to be a good platform to share that info but structurally it's probably far better than letting a third party commercial interest host these things.

[–] Bagofbuttholes@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

I haven't looked at Mastodon at all yet so I don't really know how it works, but from what I have gathered, it is not dissimilar from lemmy but for microblogs. I suppose the main similarity is its distributed network which I agree is a better solution than a centralized server. Hopefully that statement ages well.

[–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Using twitter for any kind of emergency communication is a very bad idea in the first place.

Twitter is doing everyone a favor by demonstrating exactly why that is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TicklishRocket@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's funny how Spez idolizes a guy who doesn't pay his bills. It's also funny watching the hate pplatform Twitter get absolutely destroyed by its owner. The internet in 2023 is a wild and crazily changing place.

load more comments
view more: next ›