this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
156 points (98.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53939 readers
298 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com
RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
156
Supreme Court: There's No 'Time Limit' on Copyright Infringement Claims * TorrentFreak (torrentfreak.com)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Glass0448@lemmy.today to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Image

Copyright holders can claim damages for copyright infringements that occurred years or even decades ago, the U.S. Supreme Court has clarified. In a majority decision, the Court rejected the lower court's argument that there's a three-year time limit for damages. Older claims are fair game, as long as the lawsuit is filed within three years of 'discovering' an infringement.

A copy of the Supreme Court Decision, written by Justice Elena Kagan, is available here

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 183 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Eternal copyright damages. This sounds like a safe and reasonable decision by our ever respectable Supreme Court.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 61 points 4 months ago

You forgot to mention how democratically chosen its' members are.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 96 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Hmm, need to figure out how I can trace my lineage back to the first recorded musician so that I can trademark some chords then go after every record label to have ever existed.

Then I'll try to track down the first ever written script so I can go after the movie industry next

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 49 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You’re missing the most important element. Disgustingly large pile of money that you can use to drag out a suit until the other end folds.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Just send letters en masses to smaller players who can't afford lawyers. Use those payments to hire lawyers to go after influencers and the next rung up... Use those payouts to hire even more lawyers, etc

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

I WAS THE FIRST TO ADD A 9 TO A C NOW EVERY ACOUSTIC COVER FROM 1988 TO 2004 OWES ME $6

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 50 points 4 months ago

The fuck outta here

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 48 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sexual assault victims have a time limit. Copyright infringement "victims" do not. Tracks.

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 11 points 4 months ago

Think of the kids

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Copyright itself has a time limit so... Who would be able to make a claim on a thing after it becomes public domain? 🤨

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The time limit is a century or so, so that's something our descendants can figure out.

[–] prowess2956@kbin.social 14 points 4 months ago

Just after they figure out the climate, I suppose

[–] ____@infosec.pub 10 points 4 months ago

There’s an SOL on rape in most scenarios.

But no statute of limitations on copyright violations? WTF?

[–] Zier@fedia.io 9 points 4 months ago

So we can sue AI for a fuck ton of cash? Sweet!!!