Futurology

1853 readers

136 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

voidx@futurology.today

Lugh@futurology.today

Espiritdescali@futurology.today

AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today

Following Elon Musk’s lead, Big Tech is surrendering to disinformation (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Espiritdescali@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Facebook and YouTube are receding from their role as watchdogs against conspiracy theories ahead of the 2024 presidential election

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Lugh@futurology.today 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm glad the EU is acting to combat this, but there's a deeper problem. The amount of people who lack basic critical thinking skills, and can't figure out the truth of facts for themselves. The amount of people who've become convinced vaccines are dangerous, being just one recent example of this.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eroding the aspects of public education that contribute to people's critical thinking skills and civics knowledge has been in the republican playbook since the Regan administration. Not that we were all that known for it before then...

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I mean it's pretty bad to have private corporations as gatekeepers of "the truth" in any case.

[+] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com -13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People have a huge misconception of what free speech is. Free speech is the ability to speak against or question the government without consequence. It doesn't have anything else to do with saying whatever you want to say.

Example:
"Cheerios are made by milking bats." is not free speech. It's just a lie.

"The president is wrong, and doesn't know what he's doing." is exercising my right to free speech.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The misconception is that freedom of speech means anything other than freedom from prosecution by the state for your speech. It does not mean you are entitled to a platform, it does not mean you cannot be shouted down, and it does not mean private entities cannot (or even should not) censor your speech.

It's important to keep unpopular speech legally protected. It's not at all important to ensure it has a robust platform. For example, Nazis should not be arrested for saying Nazi things; but they should absolutely be deplatformed, socially shunned, and have a blind eye cast when they get punched in the mouth for saying Nazi things in public.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Well said!

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Constitutional right to free speech does not equal a right to a platform for that speech. Disinformation should not be legally prosecuted but, it's absolute horse shit to claim that social media companies owe it the same indifference as the government does.

Stop conflating the legal right to free speech with the (non-existent) right to use someone else's platform for said speech.

[–] winky88@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Much like screaming FIRE!! in a crowded venue, there has to be a limit on free speech, and that limit is typically when it causes harm to other people