this post was submitted on 08 May 2024

21 points (95.7% liked)

Interesting Global News

2601 readers

443 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.

Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.

Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!legalnews@lemmy.zip - International and local legal news.
!technology@lemmy.zip - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip - Interesting articles, projects, and research that doesn't fit the definition of news.
!europe@feddit.org - News and information from Europe.

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

AstraZeneca requests European authorisation of Covid vaccine be pulled (www.euronews.com)

submitted 6 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

AstraZeneca was the first pharmaceutical laboratory to launch a vaccine on the market at the end of 2020, a year after the appearance of the virus.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/0MeQZ

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Huh any info about why they’ve requested this? The article doesn’t go into very much detail

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

According to https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/may/08/astrazeneca-withdraws-covid-19-vaccine-worldwide-citing-surplus-of-newer-vaccines

In a statement, AstraZeneca said the decision was made because there is now a variety of newer vaccines available that have been adapted to target Covid-19 variants. This had led to a decline in demand for the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is no longer being manufactured or supplied.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But then why pull authorisation?

Is this some kind of patent thing where they "destroy" it before it becomes public domain?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They don’t want people using an ineffective product (new strains) just because they have surplus of it that then hurts their public image

[–] Darkonion@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Or they’d like countries that have a reserve be forced to abandon that supply and buy fresh stock.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Well, the virus mutating took care of that for them.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

I don’t know if they are involved in the mRNA vaccines that have taken the market

[+] applepie@kbin.social -21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They recently admitted in court filing that their VAX does in fact have side effects. Presumably related to this.

They also covered these risks when bringing VAX to market.

We really need to find who did this and serve them some rope.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If you're going to advocate murdering people, you could at least make a token effort to be factually correct about why.

None of your anti-vax, end of the world conspiracies came true, the date just keeps getting pushed further out. It's time to shake off your cult programming, apologise to your family and move on with your life -- something millions of people don't get to do because of anti-vax idiocy.

[–] applepie@kbin.social -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Corporation literally engaged in criminal misconduct to get drug approved for the market. But you are here defending their conduct?

Fucking bootlickers, learn to think for yourself.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Fucking bootlickers, learn to think for yourself.

I can't, my brain is controlled by 4G now.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Does it matter what they admit? These companies always wait for many years to admit anything. By then the damage to people is done.

Of course one could argue that if everyone would vaccinate, almost everyone would be better off, except people with side effects. But I can absolutely understand why people don't want to risk being that person getting side effects. There is no help to be had if you are that person.