this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
26 points (96.4% liked)

United Kingdom

4083 readers
239 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] C4d@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There’s me thinking that the parts of the expansion to the North and South circulars were insisted upon by the Tory government as part of a deal supporting TFL in the COVID-era, and that all Labour’S Khan did was to tack on expansion to the East and West.

To clarify my stance: I support the ULEZ expansion. I think that the support to those who need to upgrade or modify their vehicles (including specialist and commercial vehicles) has fallen short.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I heard Khan on LBC the other day. The big problem is that the Tories brought in an order (I forget the name) that means all cities have a version of ULEZ.

Other cities have bought in their ULEZs but no one has kicked up a big fuss about it, only about London. Also, the Tories have been happily giving financial support to the other cities to help setup ULEZ but won't give anything to London.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I do think it's funny that despite all their machinations they only barely won that seat. It rather goes to show how much of a lame duck they are now.

And of course they are now facing yet another by-election where the constituents aren't particularly happy with the way the Tories handled the situation. Good old Nads, making life equally difficult for everyone.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People living in London are getting support to update their vehicles. The issue is people in the boroughs surrounding London who's councils are trying to fight it rather than solve the issue by helping the residents they're responsible for.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand it isn't it just an extension of the congestion charge? I'm kind of confused why they're upset about this but not the congestion charge.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Because the congestion charge came in when politics was relatively stable in this country and social media and dodgy news channels like Gbeebies and Talk TV hadn't turned everything into an "us Vs them, they're out to get you and your way of life" outrage. Back then you could agree that something may be for the best even though it may mean you have to adapt a bit.

[–] Treczoks@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As someone who fought for months against unwarranted ULEZ violation tickets, this would be the reason not to visit London anymore.

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 9 points 1 year ago

@Treczoks London residents or workers may not regret that. If you do, in your newer car, or by train, you may find the air is a bit nicer.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

If you can't manage to get to and from London by public transport to visit, I don't know what you're doing.