this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
612 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

10950 readers
1880 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 43 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I posted this comment a week ago, but figured I'd share it here as well.

I'm an IT consultant and I had a meeting with AWS yesterday. My manager asked me to give the AWS team an overview of our solution so they could see what they could use for a new program they were pitching our clients. That's all the information I had, so I started the meeting by saying "I'm not sure what you all are proposing, so I'm going to give you a high level but please let me know where you need more details."

After I had finished giving my overview, I tried to get more info out of them about what they were proposing to build. I shit you not, their response was that they wanted to "build an app that allowed the business to run with AI and ML (Machine Learning).”

They didn't say, "we want to solve X and Y problems" or "enable Z functionality." Literally their entire goal was to build something with AI. I'm glad I wasn't on camera or in person, because I literally face-palmed.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I had a meeting with a c-suite type from one of our clients about ten years ago. He had just read an article about APIs and wanted to find out from me how his company could start using them. His company's back end was basically nothing but APIs. This made me lose the last modicum of respect I had for c-suite types, shocking because I don't know why I even still had that modicum left.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You should be in the position and get paid their wage. Ask for a raise whenever possible.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

TBF that guy's primary responsibility was to look good in a suit (or a tech vest) and help secure the next round of venture capital funds. Not anything that I was good at.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

Then you should get paid as much as he did

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Literally their entire goal was to build something with AI.

Probably in order to replace workers ahead of their next round of mass firings.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The problem is that there’s too many employees drawing a salary brining down shareholder value and they want to get rid of as many of them as they can. /s

[–] tallricefarmer@sopuli.xyz 40 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Ok but i really hope we never fund attack insects

[–] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 6 points 6 months ago

Not all uses of such weapons are prohibited by treaty. The present invention is capable of delivering lethal and non-lethal toxins, including any agent that can be carried and administered by a mosquito.

I'm sorry but WTF. This is a patent about using mosquitoes to deliver lethal toxins? How is this not prohibited by chemical warfare treaties? Only legal if you use it against your own citizens?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Depends who they're attacking.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 months ago

Doesn't matter who they're attacking it matters who they could attack

[–] Windshear@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

I'm sure DARPA probably already has research in this area.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We do what we must, because we can.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

For the good of all of us, except the ones who are dead.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Aperture (Science) Innovators

(The original name under Cave Johnson)

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 27 points 6 months ago

Those all sound like pretty awesome projects in their own right, though.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Laugh all you want, but Artichoke Infantry is the future of fully vegan warfare!

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Anus Implosions

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

AIRBORNE ICEBERGS

Bring back Habakkuk!

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

The Datenelch (data moose) was actually a pretty good meme around 37c3.

https://hessen.social/@anno/111702349514780488