this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
200 points (96.7% liked)

Science Memes

11081 readers
2549 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's weird how true this is. Complex Analysis was a little weird conceptually sometimes, but it made sense once you wrap your head around the complex plane structure. Proofs in Real Analysis felt like they were basically just gibberish created to support the existing calculus.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 months ago

I had a 2-part real analysis course. I took the first one alongside complex analysis and the second alongside topology.

Shit was wild I kept leaning the same thing in 2 different classes in 2 different contexts, which made relating everything so much easier.

Definitely not as easy as the first semester of my BS, though. I took logic (as a philosophy credit), foundations, Algebra 1 (because the day before classes started I asked the teacher if the course would cover octonian algebra; I wanted to learn about non-associativity) and a bioethics class. That entire semester was learning how to argue and it was awesome.

[–] assa123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Well, those properties are only for holomorphic functions, otherwise it's just as hard or worse. Edit: '

[–] itsnotits@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

it's* just as hard

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

Holomorphicity is equivalent to (or defined as) being differentiable in a nonempty, connected, open set, so it's not asking much. Even then, functions which fail to be holomorphic can often be classified in a similarly rigid way.