this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
398 points (99.0% liked)

News

23665 readers
4156 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is dropping a request for a Seattle hospital to hand over records regarding gender-affirming treatment potentially given to children from Texas as part of a lawsuit settlement announced Monday. 

Seattle Children’s Hospital filed the lawsuit against Paxton’s office in December in response to the Republican appearing to go beyond state borders to investigate transgender health care. Paxton, a staunch conservative who has helped drive GOP efforts that target the rights of trans people, sent similar letters to Texas hospitals last year. 

The Seattle hospital said in a statement that it had “successfully fought” the “overreaching demands to obtain confidential patient information.” A judge in Austin dismissed the lawsuit Friday, saying the parties had settled their dispute.

Texas is among states that have enacted laws restricting or banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 92 points 8 months ago

I think it's hilarious that the Texas officials are trying to spin this as "We drove those evil child mutilators out of our state!" while SCH is just like "We never actually did any business in Texas. This doesn't impact us."

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 75 points 8 months ago

Good!

Remember just a few years ago when the Republicans were crying about their vaccine status being a health issue and not wanting anyone to ask about it.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 53 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I dunno where Republicans got this idea that they can control the behavior of their citizens in other States but it's unbelievably fucking stupid and enraging. No one is "owned" by a State simply because they are a resident of it. That's some straight up Lord / Serf kind of thinking.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Your mistake is in thinking that it's just Republicans that think you're a peasant.

Some oligarchs might just believe, at least a little, in noblesse oblige, but the thing about noblesse oblige is it's still a declaration of innate superiority.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

They got it from China probably.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 52 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Paxton, a ~~staunch conservative who has helped drive GOP efforts that target the rights of trans people~~ fascist and a bigot

There, fixed it for them.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 25 points 8 months ago

He's also a felon, so there's that...

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago

Would be great if there was a precedent set that this type of lawsuit wasn't allowed, but I'm glad we're not gambling those kid's safety on a Texas court, even if it was in Austin.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

Might be time to start paper-charting for politically sensitive operations. Billing and everything. Get the process done, give a copy to the patient to do with what they will, and shred everything hospital side.

Protecting patient's from neonazis is becoming a routine part of healthcare.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Rich old white dude: is disgrace; lives in Texas

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

That's a terrible haiku.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The party of States' Rights™ going outside of their states' jurisdiction to enforce state-level laws. All this work, and for what? To make a handful of people miserable, who found help at this particular hospital? For the legal precedent to make more people miserable?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

All this work, and for what? To make a handful of people miserable, who found help at this particular hospital?

To please the religious. For them they are doing lord's work.

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

For the legal precedent to make more people miserable?

Shopping for a case that the SCOTUS might hear.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This shitstain tried really hard to make a loss sound like a win. He failed miserably.

“When we merely began asking questions, [someone needs to tell him that ‘only asking questions’ has become a joke about sealioning] they decided to leave the State of Texas [I don’t understand how they could ‘leave’ when they never advertised or did business there in the first place] and forfeit the opportunity to do business here,[which was probably a very easy choice for a business based in Seattle]” Paxton said in a news release Monday.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Stupid fucks lmao