this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
325 points (100.0% liked)

196

16244 readers
1873 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Easy, the MTG player actually wants to draw more therefore the +4 benefits him. Neither the gun nor the rooks stand a chance against him at this point.

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but they're playing mono-W so unless they draw into another plains, probably nothing too threatening is hitting the field.

[–] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless they draw into their Heliod + Ballista combo

... or a tutor that lets them find their Heliod + Ballista combo

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're forgetting that 22 is probably instant speed, which means ballista is dead before it can combo off. So white needs something else to win because strategically black is better with the extra rooks.

[–] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Hmm, true. I suppose they'd need something like Angelic Grace to protect them

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No bullets in the revolver and it didn't belong to checkov so it's not important anyway no more csrds to draw from. So A for sure

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Have you considered bribery? The drugs may improve performance, but they're addictive, and expensive. That gun could go for a fair amount of money.

Black bribes white to throw the match, and white saves face by pointing out blacks rook count. Player b wins the game, but the international chess committee send them a very, very strongly worded email

[–] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, Bribery is a blue card, so it's not in the color identity of either player

[–] Little8Lost@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago

Anarchychess?

[–] Gurfaild@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Google en hancingdrugs

[–] sock@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

its gotta be b bros got 4 rooks on the board he's just missing the sorry piece that white has. the only chance player a has is spending all their lands on a blue eyes white dragon or smth idk i never played poker

[–] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It depends on what kind of deck the white player has. If it's cheap hate bears, stax, or board wipes (all the good things in mono white, in other words), then I think they have a solid shot

[–] ImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Y'all'd've done well to pay attention in English class.

[–] Blahaj_Blast@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's bad, is that I'm about 95%sure I've legit heard words like that used but my Southern family

"Y'all'd've" just so we're clear

[–] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm 95% certain I've said y'all'd've before unironically.

I said y'all'ld've more than once yesterday.

Whmst've y'said y'all'd've to?

[–] lemmonade@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

technically lands are colorless, plains just produce white mana

otherwise everything seems fine and legal here

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

The winner's spirit is revenant-capable, so the only thing the gun can do is assure a draw. The heart of a champion, while useful in some rites to please the gods is still mortal. So only civil victories are attainable here at least without making an ectoplasmic mess.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would say the revolver but in response to getting shot in the head you just swords their king, checkmate.