this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
38 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16796 readers
1 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

In every comment thread about the importance of supporting Firefox, there's always at least one comment claiming Firefox is slow, even while I repeatedly see the data say otherwise.

Anecdotally, I've used Firefox, Waterfox, and Librewolf on PC, and none have been slow.

I've used Firefox, Firefox Beta, and Fennec on Android, and if anything they seem faster and easier to use than Chrome (and they actually tend to work like an actual internet browser).

I'm not saying these commenters are all Google sockpuppets, but maybe they're parroting misinformation, or maybe they're using ~~an Apple OS~~ iOS, where Firefox is basically Safari.

It's just really perplexing to me.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I have suspected for a while it is astroturfing. Same as with GIMP and Libre Office where inevitably someone will trash the UI as it's "soooo bad". If you say a lie, and repeat it enough, people start to believe it.

[–] million@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m a huge fan of open source but saying the only people saying Gimps UI is bad are astroturfing is insane.

It’s famously controversial and uses UI paradigms that don’t exist in any modern desktop environments.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not, but it's not like it's an occasional thing. Every time it's brought up, it's trashed. Free software that does a better job than anything else free, and folk bash it. Either they like and are motivated by Adobe dominance, or they're useful idiots.

It's balanced to say "great program, but could do with a UI improvement". It isn't to say it's unusable because of UI. I cannot imagine any free software advocate should be proud of taking that line.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don't need to praise the software specifically because it's Open Source. We need good Open source Software of which there are plenty of great examples.

Blender, Krita, Libre Office, Audacity. These are great. Better than the paid competitors in a lot for ways.

Gimp and scribus are simply not. That should mean we start developing good FOSS software to fill that gap, as a collective.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tenacity, not audacity. Audacity got took over by a company with questionable record and tried to add telemetry into it. Tenacity was the OS fork which stayed true to principles.

GIMP may not be your bag, but it's highly used and many find it has much higher quality features than the alternatives. UI may not be popular, but it doesn't prevent it being a solid bit of open source software.

Btw, what steps have you taken to improve open source graphics software? It's easy to bash, it's harder to learn and contribute.

Open source contributors > open source advocates > grateful open source users > almost everyone else > open source critics

[–] GizmoLion@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One doesn't need to be a dev to have opinions about ease of use of a piece of software, don't be dense.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is true, but to get free software made by people in their free time and say "this is rubbish" is a little ungrateful.

"Here, have this free food...". " ewww gross, that is so bad".

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

I'm saying is that there is tons of open source software that isn't crap. Gimp has no excuse it should be as good as the others.

Especially one as mature as Gimp.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] sab@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every time I introduce someone to LibreOffice I half expect them to hate it, and that I'll have to go through the alternative interfaces and try to make them accept it and potentially install OnlyOffice instead if that doesn't help.

Instead, I'm generally met with an "oh, this is nice", before they start typing away.

I get that some of the bigger nerds would prefer something different (I would personally love the power of LibreOffice inside a modern minimalist GTK app), but LibreOffice is working great for most users. Those passionate enough to see an issue with it probably prefer markdown or latex anyway.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've only introduced LibreOffice to one person in recent memory, and her reaction was basically, “This is free?! I wish I knew about this years ago.”

[–] Millie@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I love GIMP's UI. It's clean, it's to the point, and it's stayed basically the same for ages!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] uthredii@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it depends on the website. There are some websites where chrome will work better either because chrome works better with certain libraries/technologies or because the developers put more time into optimizing for chrome.

On the other hand Firefox might have less bloat around telemetry that gives it an advantage too.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Oh absolutely true, and one would probably notice it more if one uses a lot of Google's services (though Microsoft is even worse in my experience, with nerfing its services if you don't use Edge), but this still doesn't explain why just a normal user would proclaim Firefox is "slow as fuck" without anything to support this, and that's what I'm seeing in nearly every thread that mentions Firefox.

[–] hellfire103@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On top of that, Firefox was recently found to be faster than Chrome.

Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, Google.

[–] XiELEd@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Chrome is a memory hog compared to Firefox lol

[–] SankaraStone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's time for Firefox and others to sue Google for antitrust. When you're using your monopoly to force web "standards" (instead of having an independent third party set standards) that cause developers to stop supporting your rival browser is clearly illegal monopoly actions.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Puh. Mozilla is Google's pet that keeps them out of anti-trust court.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Gnubyte@lemdit.com 3 points 1 year ago

Sigh. Whoever they have working in their DRM department has been an asshole for a long time now.

This is what the third or fourth - minimum - thing like this they've tried to pass in a few years? I actually like Google as a product family but every time they do this it hits me right in the "maybe I should reconsider" department. Its also usually met with a hard resounding no from everyone. Maybe its that they have a task force that is paid well to protect their ad interests and recover some sort of deficit they see in their ad product.

I donate to the EFF to fight things like this at a professional level...also good to point out though that its not just google's fault. If they build a moat for businesses and everyone installs one, that is everyone's fault.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People have been very vocal about this in the issues for that repo. https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/issues?q=is%3Aissue

[–] Domille@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Drm- Digital "rights" management, more like digital restrictions management is a thing that tries to make sure the things you own are restricted by someone else. It s the reason some singleplayer games dont work offline, some apps wont let you record them or Blu Ray discs try to stop you from copying them. things that you own. Thwy are controlled by corporations that can say who can use the media. Even if a device is perfectly able to play a movie, Google can not allow it so Neflix would not trust the device. Examples are Denuvo and Widevine https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_rights_management

[–] sil3ntki11@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I end up switching more and more of my stuff away from Google every time something like this comes out.

[–] peregus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A quick, non-technical explanation:

  • Google is working toward implementing a new protocol in Google Chrome, “Manifest v3”, that will be intrusive and help enforce Digital Rights Management, as well as stopping ad blockers.
  • Under the guise of this being safe, secure, and to curb bots, Mv3 will require users to become Trusted by using the Chrome browser.
  • Since the majority of users are using Google Chrome, this will heavily influence corporations to adopt this protocol in their service.
  • A Trusted user can access Netflix in the browser. If you’re using Firefox or are an untrusted user, you will not be able to access Netflix in your browser.
  • This protocol will appear one day in some form, and it will greatly shift the internet and force more users into Google’s ecosystem.
  • This will spread to all areas of the internet - Banking web sites, government web sites, healthcare, entertainment, education, etc.
  • The internet will become less “free” over time. More censorship, less rights.
  • Lots of ads can contain malware. Considering that Google allows phishing sites to pay for an ad to appear directly in Google search results, there is no confidence that Mv3 will be safe or secure.

See my other comments in this Post for more details.

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

ELI5 please?

Will using Firefox fix it?

What can we do to make them fail?

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a long video with many points and better if you watch it. However, here's a break down of key points, made to be as simple as possible - there's a lot more technical stuff, but I'll try to keep it concise and less technical.

This is probably about a 10 minute read if these concepts are not familiar to you:

  1. Google owns Chrome (not Chromium), and they dominate the market ever since they won the internet browser wars.
  2. As an amoral corporation (not evil, simply lacking morals), their business runs on advertisements.
  3. They're revealing a new feature called Manifest v3 which is a locked down version of the browser that's built around what they feel is security and trust.
  4. Under their proposal for Manivest v3, your browser will have to be "verified" in an attempt to keep you "safe". Are you a human or a bot? They're making a more trusted internet with trusted software.
  5. Companies like Netflix, news web sites, etc. will eat this up and implement the proper protocols to use Manifest v3. To visit your bank's web site which has this protocol, you'll need to use Chrome's browser.
  6. Using Chrome's browser, you'll need to authenticate yourself and become a "trusted" user. With this enabled, you can then visit your bank's web site.
  7. If you use an alternative browser that isn't approved, you won't be able to use that web site.
  8. Eventually other corporations will implement these protocols, too, and you'll be locked out from participating in the internet.
  9. Google, an ad company, gets to control advertisements better, gets to learn more about their users, and now gets to mark them as "trusted". In other words, you get the North Korean version of the internet, "Mommy and Daddy's Safe and Approved Internet". Meanwhile, North Korea and Mom/Dad get to spy on you, see what you're up to, monitor you, control you, and shape you. The benefit is they also make money off you by selling the information they learn about you.

Why is this bad:

  1. It's censorship. It's like your mom and dad grabbing your phone, computer, enabling severe parental controls, giving it back to you, and they get to see and approve what you're allowed to do and say at any time. Apply that same protocol to your money, too. Want to send money through the internet using PayPal? Even more censorship. Want to watch Netflix? Your parents lock it down so only certain things can be watched, at certain times, and certainly under their permission.
  2. It buries competition and makes Google even more of a monopoly. We already know Google Search is bad (advertisements, phishing web sites, auto-generated content web sites are always the first results in Google.
  3. Digital Rights Management. Just a bit north of 20 years ago, when you purchased a digital product, you could own it. Streaming didn't exist. In an age where "buying" no longer means "owning", this new protocol will further enforce DRM. Pay for Netflix and want to watch it? You'll have to be a Trusted User that uses Chrome. Bought a new video game you're excited to play on Steam? You'll need to be a Trusted User. Don't want to stream music through Spotify and instead use something like Bandcamp? To make a purchase at Bandcamp, you'll need to be a Trusted User. Don't want to buy something through Bandcamp and instead just download what you already paid for? You guessed right - you'll need to be a trusted user to even login and reach your downloads. Don't forget your downloads are hosted on servers that are run by Google and Amazon - you'll have to be a trusted user in order to download from that server.

Can I use Firefox and stop using any Chromium browser

  • Most browsers are Chromium: Chrome, Brave, Ungoogled Chromium to name a few. They will all eventually implement Manifest v3, and if they don't, they will disappear.
  • Firefox is not Chromium, but think about how many users use Firefox now. Google Chrome has the overwhelming market share and has captured users into their platform.
  • Because the majority of users use Chrome, corporations have to evolve to adopt Manifest v3: banking web sites, governments, job applications, benefits, healthcare, personal emergency, etc. All of these will be forced to adopt it because that's where the users are, and Google will force corporations to participate. After all, banking web sites will face less downtime through Manifest v3, because bots won't be able to spam them and try to get in. Netflix will have to spend less money on security, because only trusted users will be able to even reach Netflix. Your "free" email service through Gmail now stops all spam because it only accepts incoming messages from trusted users. Of course everyone will adopt it - Google is safe, secure, and trusted. And best of all it's "free"!
  • If you use Firefox now and continue to use it, you'll be safe for several years. For now.

What can we do?

  • Right now, you can opt out of using Chrome by using Firefox and other decentralized tools.
  • In the not too distant future, there's not much that you can do. Educating users to switch from Chrome, use Linux, use stock Android (e.g., Graphene OS), will not help.
  • Eventually, the users that use Firefox, Linux, stock de-googled Android will get locked out. An average user isn't going to invest their time to learn these platforms. They'll stick with what works: "I can login to Chrome and watch my Netflix and pay my bills. You're telling me that this Linux thing doesn't let me do that? Screw that, I'll use Chrome OS - at least my shit works! What's wrong with these Linux developers, they can't get anything right! They should take a lesson from Google and fix their shit."
  • Write your politicians and hope that some governments will help restrict this rollout. Keep in mind though that some version of this will get passed and approved. Also don't forget that corrupt regulators and politicians are captured and owned by corporations. This will get passed, there's no doubt about it.

What will happen 20 years from now?

  • Humans have tenacity. You can only frustrate humans so much before they break. Take away too many of their freedoms, impose many restrictions, and eventually they will break.
  • The trick for all of time, seen throughout history by all our overlords, kings, emperors, etc. is to find a careful balance. Take away "just enough" freedoms. Give them "just enough". Work them until they're tired, but don't let them break. And of course, give them a few handouts here and there, but not enough to make their lives easy.
  • Manifest v3 (or its derivative) will be implemented. There's no doubt about that at all.
  • The 99% of the population will continue to use these services because they want to be able to participate: They have to pay bills, access money, access healthcare, use government systems, do education, have entertainment, etc.
  • The 99% will continue to use this because they won't care. So long as they can be happy enough, they will persist.
  • Eventually, an infinitesimally small minority will be affected by something. Something will break and cause them to snap, and they will do the only thing that an individual human can do: opt out.
  • That small minority will leave, opt out, and refuse to participate in the system. Those clusters will grow at an extremely small rate because they're able to recognize the whole picture and see that personal freedoms are so restricted. They'll remember their history and learn from it.
  • Enter decentralization - the removal of power from centralized authority.
  • Those who recognize decentralization will build new platforms, and others will eventually follow. This is why the Fediverse and Bitcoin exist. They recognize the problem of centralization and are full of users who decided to opt out. The Fediverse adoption exploded with the 2023 Reddit API problem, and the constant Twitter issues under Elon Musk. Bitcoin happened in 2009 out of anger from the 2008 global financial crisis when "Satoshi Nakomoto" gave, as a gift to the world, a permissionless peer-to-peer decentralized economy of money that had "rules, but without rulers".

What happens 20+ years from now?

  • In 30 years when more of the population realizes their freedoms are under attack, they'll consult the ones who left 10 years previously.
  • In 40 years, you might have choice. There may be a "new Firefox" that pops up after the old Firefox was wiped out 10 years ago, and let's you use the internet, your IP, and your content in a different way.
  • The trick is to train yourself to see the big picture. You'll never defeat your overlords - they're behind tall walls and they control the money. However, you can opt out. You can refuse to participate. But by doing so, remember that you will be locked out. That's not an easy choice to make.
  • But those users that do opt out, they will be the ones that were pushed too far. This is why refugees leave their homes - they just want to be safe, they want to be alright, they want their freedom from their opressors.
  • We will have "Google Internet" (Manifest v3) refugees one day.

“We no longer have choice. We no longer have voice. And what is left when you have no choice and no voice? Exit.” - Andreas Antonopoulos

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There is no ecosystem as mature, polished and integrated as Apple’s. I am all in with them and the way all their devices and services work together is just marvellous.

But the answer to your general question is you will need to go all in on a single company. And TBH, you should. They are all bad to some degree. But cobbling together a pipeline of various manufacturers will always result in a terrible experience, and you’ll be generally paying the same for it anyway.

load more comments
view more: next ›