this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
250 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

34769 readers
139 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NightAuthor@beehaw.org 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Give me a Technology Connections (@TechConnectify@mas.to) video on it

[–] mySFWaccount@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was literally my first thought when I saw the article.

[–] teacosts@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Llcooljessie@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I'm about to talk about Christmas lights for an 70 minutes."

"Hell yeah, bro!"

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

"This goofy fridge has a really clever design. It's also kinda terrible."

63 minutes long, and still super enjoyable.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, I so want that!

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

I like the sounds of the tines! It's basically just a tuning fork, so wild.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Our first tv with a remote control that wasn't me or my sibling using small vise grip on channel knob had a telephone included in the tv.

Like this was in 1982 so not a modem ... just a tv with a land line phone built in that you have to use the remote to make or receive a call.

[–] SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Yes! Those channel knobs were so easily broken. I thought we were the only ones turning channels with pair of vice-grips clamped on the nub.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

This was mentioned a couple of weeks ago on the Vergecast. I was wondering if someone was going to get assigned the article, and here it is!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I had a Heathkit TV that used a variation of this design! If you held it really close to your ear then you could actually hear it emitting.

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 3 points 1 year ago

@igalmarino In my childhood our remote worked by emitting electronically generated ultrasonic sounds. It looked like that one: kleinanzeigen.de/s-anzeige/tel…

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

That's fancy. Our clicker only had two buttons for channel changing.

[–] Prootje@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never seen or heard from anyone using tape to mask their remotes. Is this really a thing?

[–] sawdustprophet@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Never seen or heard from anyone using tape to mask their remotes. Is this really a thing?

Not this exactly, but my grandparents had a guide taped to the backside of their remotes to make it easier to use.

The tape strategy has some appeal, though, mainly in that I use maybe 5 buttons 95% of the time.

[–] Llcooljessie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Those don't take batteries and your click generates the electricity for the signal. Right? Like a wind up radio.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it's a tuning fork that produces 4 seperate tones, one for each "button." The TV had a microphone listening for tones and would respond accordingly. You didn't actually have to point the remote at the TV, which later became a problem, as the mic on the TV was technically always listening for a tone.

[–] Llcooljessie@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Neat. I knew I could Cunningham Law this instead of doing research.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can always count on fucking nerds to get excited about explaining something.

[–] Llcooljessie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool. Now, where can we go to talk about CBB?

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

heynong.social? probably nowhere. or some weird earwolf forum.

[–] indun@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, you violated the law slightly by asking a question!

Cunningham's Law states "the best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer."

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Nope! It's the sound that does the work. The TV has a microphone in it.