this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
303 points (97.5% liked)

memes

10407 readers
1639 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FoxyGrandpa@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"why (some OK movie from 20 years ago) is a masterpiece"

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Cuz things now are shit and we realised we have peaked back then (I actually have no idea)

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Cuz it’s a children’s movie and I loved the movie as a child but now I’m an adult and today’s children’s movies aren’t the same

[–] Deello@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

"... and it'll happen to you"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 33 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] slightperil@lemm.ee 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is always my main comment about those movies. They have made absolutely no cultural impact whatsoever. Very beautiful, but it's just skin deep.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

They're impressive tech demos, that's something!

[–] edwardbear@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

some might even say blue skin deep

[–] noredcandy@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

You can’t have a movie as big as avatar without it appealing to basically everyone, and thus, the “impact” is broad, not deep.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 28 points 7 months ago (5 children)
[–] xpinchx@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Did you know the letters of the movie are the DNA letters? A-T G-C

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

isn't that explained in the movie? it's been a while

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

We had to watch it in biology class. Idk if I learned anything, but it did make me curious about adding moar leg.

[–] mihnt@lemy.lol 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Now I wanna see a cyberpunk drama where you need more ass to join NASA

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Predestination. The lead character joins nasa as a space prozzie

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago

"I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite policy proposal in this thread. "

"We'll bang, okay?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Yes and that movie rules

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 7 points 7 months ago

I love that movie.

It left me very impressed.

[–] PatMustard@feddit.uk 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

People do talk about Gattaca, it's probably the most realistic cyberpunk movie I've seen!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's about time we taked about Death to Smoochy.

[–] lookorex@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

LOVE that movie.

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think my favorite is "My review of a movie from 1983 that everyone's already seen 5 times"

[–] doppydrop@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Maybe seen 5 times by age, but we should be really talking about the little known 1983 masterpiece, Mr Mom, it will change you as a person.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DestroyerOfWorlds@sh.itjust.works 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I swear if you call be bitch 15 or 16 more times, I'm going to leave!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"First, I wanna thank my sponsor WORLD OF TANKS!"

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

"Got some state secrets to leak but also got no friends? Leak them on World of Tanks to prove an insignificant point."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hey, that movie is a cult classic! YOU WOULDN'T SAY THAT TO SOMEONE WITH ROBOT LEGS!

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

ADIOS.. TURD NUGGETS

[–] dunz@feddit.nu 5 points 7 months ago

HOW CAN SHE SEE ME!?

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

i dont like techno

you would if you had robot ears

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

God dammit. I wasn't planning on watching a movie today, but now I have to rewatch this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's a symantical trap.

Any movie mentioned is being talked about.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

what if it's telepathically communicated

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] dudinax@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago

No way. Fletch has one of the most chilling "bad cop" scenes in any movie. I'll talk about it.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Someone should do one on Bugsy Malone. I'm assuming it's already been done but hey, whatever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GombeenSysadmin@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Popeye. So much so, that my phone autocorrected it to Popeyes, and that doesn’t exist in my country.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I bet no one knows how strong spinach can make you, then

[–] DrDominate@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It has to be the crappy canned spinach. If you can power through a can of raw spinach, you'd probably be jacked

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 4 points 7 months ago
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] batucada@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • should be obvious they pad their vids for runtime (unsuccessfully boring)
  • they need to cool it with the titles; we live in a post clickbait world
[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

theres a chrome/firefox extension that fixes youtube clickbait titles and thumbnails called DeArrow, by the same dev as Sponsorblock, which unpads the vids.

https://sponsor.ajay.app

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

DeArrow has improved my YouTube experience. I still switch it off for some channels I like (such as SiIvaGunner, for reasons that are obvious if you watch them.) It's best when it has crowdsourced titles, which have actually made some videos more intriguing.

I saw a video thumbnail the other day that would normally be titled "Why Minecraft players built a real life supercomputer", which is way too vague for me to be interested, but the crowdsourced title was "Minecrafters created a distributed computation network to find the tallest cactus," and that made me very curious. I still didn't click it because it was a 23 minute video, though.

I'm also very grateful I don't have to see a lot of clickbait thumbnails. Some of them actively deter me from videos that might otherwise be interesting.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sponsorblock, which unpads the vids.

Not sure if i'd say that Sponsorblock upads videos, or at least it only does so partially. It does remove in-video advertisement and selfpromotion, but it doesn't (and can't really) change anything if a video e.g. has content to fill like 3min, which gets drawn out to 10min.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

I suspect, with almost 0 evidence, that the reason clickbait seems so effective is that there's a large contingent of viewers that it works on. So when you try playing the game, you'll see a surge in popularity. But such easily-won viewers are also easily lost if you don't play the game well enough, or someone else does it better. So if you want to keep your numbers up, you have to play the game hard, but doing that can drive away the loyal viewers that would seek out your videos even if the algorithm stopped promoting them. You can't measure your success through metrics alone.

In a way, if you play the game how YouTube wants you to play it (which is of course what makes them the most money,) you stop being an artist using YouTube as your platform and start being a worker for YouTube instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›