this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
262 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3160 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Kim Taylor of Woodbury county given eight-month custodial sentence for helping Jeremy Taylor fraudulently win election

An Iowa woman found guilty on 52 counts of voter fraud, carried out in support of her Republican husband, was given an eight-month custodial sentence.

Kim Taylor, of Woodbury county, will serve four months in prison and four in home confinement, KTIV, a Sioux City TV station, reported. Subject to two years’ supervised release, Taylor will also pay $5,200.

Each count carried a maximum penalty of five years in prison – or 260 years in all.

During sentencing on Monday, Leonard Strand, the judge, said a vastly lighter punishment was correct because of factors including Taylor’s caretaking role for her children and good community standing.

Taylor’s husband, Jeremy Taylor, ran for Congress in 2020, losing a Republican primary. He was then elected to the Woodbury county board of supervisors. He resigned as board chair after his wife was convicted but remains a board member. He was not charged in the voter fraud case but has said he will not seek re-election.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 72 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Convicted of 52 counts of vote fraud and sentenced to 4 months in prison out of a possible 260 years? Sounds about white.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think this punishment is closer to what it should be than the alternative. Instead of pushing for whites to get harder sentences, we should be pushing for everyone to get the white sentencing treatment.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

260 years is for sure overkill, imo, but 4 months is ridiculous. The intent was clear and the actions were intentional through and through. I think 5 years minimum should be required. Fuck her "community standing" and her corrupt AF husband can take care of the kids while she does hard time. I didn't see, but are any of the charges felonies, or will this all show on her record as a simple misdemeanor, further not carrying much significance? What a joke.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Can't argue with that.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If this is the same one that's been all over the place for the last few days, she's a Vietnamese immigrant.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

She's neither black nor Latina, and that appears to be the dividing line where sentencing is concerned particularly to those married to a white, probably wealthy, republican politician.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I think it doesn't matter, as long as she's in the cult she's as good as white.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

It's almost trite at this point, but

🎶every accusation is a confession🎶

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How does 52 counts of voter fraud for the wife of a politician equal “good community standing”

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

She’s a Good Christian Republican, which means she’s a Moral and Upstanding Person, because only Moral and Upstanding people become Christian Republicans.

So obviously it was just a momentary lapse in her Good Judgement.

I wish I was being sarcastic but this is actually how they think.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

It's ALWAYS projection with the conservatives. Always.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


An Iowa woman found guilty on 52 counts of voter fraud, carried out in support of her Republican husband, was given an eight-month custodial sentence.

Kim Taylor, of Woodbury county, will serve four months in prison and four in home confinement, KTIV, a Sioux City TV station, reported.

During sentencing on Monday, Leonard Strand, the judge, said a vastly lighter punishment was correct because of factors including Taylor’s caretaking role for her children and good community standing.

The guilty verdict is an example of how the justice system works to protect the voting rights of citizens and ensure fair and honest elections.”

Analysing voter fraud case data collected by the hard-right Heritage Foundation, the nonpartisan Brookings Institution recently said: “So, what’s going on here?

Taylor’s lawyer, F Montgomery Brown, said he did not “see anything in the internal communications that suggested there was any influence by the Biden administration whatsoever.


The original article contains 599 words, the summary contains 150 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Just republican shit.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Can anyone summarise what the fraud was?

[–] Birdie@thelemmy.club 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Last November, Kim Taylor was found guilty of 26 counts of providing false information in registering and voting, 23 counts of fraudulent voting and three counts of fraudulent registration.

The office of the US attorney for the northern district of Iowa said Taylor “perpetrated a scheme to fraudulently generate votes for her husband in the primary election for Iowa’s fourth US congressional district in June 2020.

Taylor submitted or caused others to submit dozens of voter registrations, absentee ballot request forms, and absentee ballots containing false information. Taylor completed and signed voter forms without voters’ permission and told others that they could sign on behalf of relatives who were not present.”

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago