this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
834 points (96.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5597 readers
4359 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 69 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

They killed him cause he told them to love each other. That'll get you killed just about anywhere. Humans love to hate.

That said the air of 'I'm special' didn't help.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And then, one Thursday, nearly two thousand years after one man had been nailed to a tree for saying how great it would be to be nice to people for a change, one girl sitting on her own in a small cafe in Rickmansworth suddenly realized what it was that had been going wrong all this time, and she finally knew how the world could be made a good and happy place. This time it was right, it would work, and no one would have to get nailed to anything.

-- Douglas Adams, The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy

(Immediately after she realized it, the Earth gets destroyed.)

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

let's maybe not push the propagandic idea that humans are inherently bad, humans are in fact inherently extremely friendly (to a fault) and the idea that the opposite is true is part of what's needed to restrain our inherent need to help others.

Any time a group of humans is placed in a difficult position they start working together, there's that famous example of a group of kids accidentally ending up basically recreating Lord of the flies except they just got along and eventually had pretty comfortable lives, because as it turns out working together makes things way easier!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Humans mostly help each other. Governments do not like challenges to their authority. Jesus was killed because of the challenge he represented to the Pharisees. Ultimately Rome killed him, but at the demand of the Pharisees and an unruly mob that had been whipped into a frenzy.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They killed him because all he did was preach the apocalypse and the end times to a bunch of poors that began upsetting the power dynamic.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=z8j3HvmgpYc

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 62 points 6 months ago (4 children)

They didn't barely kill him. He was dead for like a weekend. They killed the witches properly.

Except for the Sanderson sisters. They took a couple tries.

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They didn’t barely kill him. He was dead for like a weekend. They killed the witches properly.

Sounds like a skill issue. If the witches were any good at witching, they wouldnt have died either.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, Jesus was a lich. That's a whole other power level

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

If there's another story for his resurrection,I'd love to hear it.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

He was mostly dead. Not all dead.

[–] TwentySeven@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheLoneMinon@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

NO HE'S NOT DEAD YET

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There’s a chocolate for that too… I think.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Aaaaah, look who knows so much

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago

The Hebrews have many levels of dead

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

The Salem trials came later. I wonder if there discussion was like Townsperson 1: "So this woman with the wart, should we just nail her to a couple pieces of wood"

Townsperson 2: "Nah man, remember the last guy we did that with. Didn't take"

Townsperson 1: "Riiiight. So, wood, nails, and a bonfire then?"

Townsperson 2: Yeah that should do it"

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean....its not their fault male magic users are harder to kill.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 38 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It wasn't his followers that killed him though. His followers did however torture and kill women.

[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ya but I'm pretty sure the witches' followers didn't kill the witches either. Obviously just needed more followers. Clearly, the predominant religion is the one with the most followers willing to kill competing dark arts users. It's basically politics.

[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It depends on which witches you are talking about; 800AD+ its probably persecution, prior to that it's probably Rome clearing out Human Sacrifice cults. It's one of the major reasons Rome was so hard on ancient Briton and why Christianity had such an easy time converting Scandinavia.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Many times it was to get property. If a landowner died and had no children his wife would inherit the land. If that woman were to die before remarrying and having children, then the lord of that area would get that land. If that woman were to be accused of being a witch, then that same Lord would preside over the trial and determine whether the woman was guilty of witchcraft. I think you can see a conflict of interest here.

Check the history of Luxembourg. It got so bad the Church had to step in. Now the church wasn't a great defender of women's rights, but this kind of thing got so bad even the church had to say "ok you're taking this too far."

But sometimes it was for petty reasons. Someone in town hates a woman for whatever then accusations of witchcraft were made. This is kinda anecdotal, but I got an ancestor that lived in Salem, Mass. and there was a witch trial simply because a woman got re-married to my ancestor too soon after her previous husband died.

Although the poster above made a goof by mentioning Jesus, the general sentiment of the whole witchcraft thing being about killing women for horrible (and sometimes petty) reasons seems right to me.

[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

See the qualification. 800 AD is my personal cutoff for genuine action rather than persecution, but that's mostly familiarity with English and French history. Other regions likely experienced more. Though given that Luxembourg was contested territory for much of the time in question It's probably safe to apply either French or German history.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

this is where i wish lemmy had r/askhistorians because i remember for a fact there’s some mandela effect here and culturally we are misremembering something key but as a non-historian i’d look like an idot trying to call it out

edit: ok i figured it out and my point is moot. i am remembering that the Salem witch trials in America did not involve burnings, but hangings. however the witch trials in Europe very much did involve burning.

sorry for the semi-useless comment haha

[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No worries I too miss AskHistorians. Reddit could have been more.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

literally the modern burning of the library of alexandria is going on and no one* is talking about it

*ok probably not no one im just being overdramatic

[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Probably, but we don't mind. Most of us are refugees watching the burning, and mourning what could have been.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 6 months ago

there’s just so much value to historians being accessible to the public. there’s a reason universities pay them tenure despite not bringing immediate material benefit to the local community or economy, and reddit seemingly magically allowed for a forum that was even more open and accessible than a university.

and now that’s being fucked over by IPOs and LLMs.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, the penalty for being a witch was hanging. Unfortunately the test to prove you were a witch sometimes involved tying you up and throwing you into a lake to see if you float or sink, and if you float then they would hang you. Of course the situation resolved itself if you didn't float. No one ever floated.

[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Or putting you under a stone.

Giles Corey, one of the more famous Salem victims. His wife was tried for witchcraft, and while he stood against her, he got wrapped up in it, too. They placed large stones over his body, telling him if he confessed he would be given a clean death.

His last words are reported to be "More weight".

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They killed him because he pissed off the State, not because magic tricks.

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Jesus was killed because he angered the Pharisees (specifically the Priests) by defying their authority and teaching the new covenant. The Romans (aka "the state") were only invested insofar as it would prevent a revolt. Pontius Pilate found no fault in Christ and offered Barrabas instead (a convicted murderer) but the Pharisees would not relent and wanted Jesus crucified. Pilate famously washed his hands of the business because even he knew it was an injustice.

[–] RandomApple@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pharisees specifically weren't the priests. They were one of the branches of judaism who didn't think temple was necessary for proper worship (which is why they became the predominant branch after the destruction of the temple and rabbinic judaism stems from them), while temple was where priests worked and performed their rites. If you open your Bible to any of the four gospels, you will find that they say it was the priests who brought Jesus to Pilate.

Also, you shouldn't take gospels at their word for what they say about Pilate as they insert their theological concerns into Pilate's judgement. If you read Josephus, he clearly states Pilate condemns Jesus for claiming to be a king, ie. for political uprising, and even Mark, the earliest of gospels, doesn't state that Pilate didn't think Jesus guilty, unlike the other three.

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I specifically clarified that Jesus angered the Pharisee priest class. I'm aware that they were a jewish sect.

The Priests were "money changing" in the temple which is why Jesus flipped over the table and cast them out. The temple was a key part of their religious practices and the laity used the temple.

While not an expert I am aware of Josephus and his account of Jesus's trial. The only account I've ever read concerning the trial of Jesus is extremely brief and favorable to the description provided by the gospels. The fact that Pilate "condemns" him makes sense because only Pilate has that authority. Even if someone had a wildly different interpretation this would still be a single attestation by a Roman Jew.

It's worth mentioning that Rabbinical Judaism did not form completely until the 5th or 6th century.

[–] RandomApple@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as the Pharisee priest class. There are the Pharisees, and there are the priests. Two seperate groups that disagreed in their teachings quite a bit.

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm referring to pharisee priests/rabbis (e.g. whatever you want to call the religious leaders). The differing groups you're referring to are the pharisees and the sadducees and perhaps even the samaritans.

Edit: Reread your comment and it makes sense. It was the Pharisees sans priests.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Theres a film about the book about it.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can't wait for the anime adaptation

[–] Vedlt@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Oh man, let me tell you about The Flying House.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Flying_House_(TV_series)

Turns out maybe my ultra-christian grandma is the reason I turned into the heathen weeb I am today!

[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Best selling mythology ever.

[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Even a former president wants in on that best seller money.

[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Every con man has for the last 10 centuries.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 6 months ago

They killed him on a fancier stake, too!