this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
40 points (97.6% liked)

Linguistics

503 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laymen to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

  1. Stay on-topic. Specially for more divisive subjects.
  2. Post sources whenever reasonable to do so.
  3. Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
  4. Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rognaut@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Paywall! But the title just seems like an obvious conclusion.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The title is kind of obvious, but the conclusion of the article is interesting: that we should be taking into account the social aspects of linguistic relativity, not just the individual ones.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

In Entish, anything that's worth saying is worth taking your time to say it.

[–] birdcat@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

if anyone has this pls share.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Suggestion/idea: you could add the link to the original post.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago
[–] birdcat@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

thank you very much!

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Yo juego a futbol y al Monopoli.

And I learned Spanish in high school, so some paper this is.