this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
39 points (93.3% liked)

Games

16697 readers
676 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] entropicshart@sh.itjust.works 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So many of these games require servers when it shouldn’t. Playing simple coop should not be dependent on the companies underwhelming server infrastructure.

Borderlands proved this with allowing people to host coop sessions without any need for servers.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Conversely, this game is P2P where it should have dedicated servers. This would also solve the issue of requiring such aggressive anticheat (nprotect gameguard, used mostly by cheap east asian mmorpgs) because they could use the dedicated servers to authenticate purchases as well as most cheats. Generally server authoritative games (as oppposed to most P2P games being client authoritative) are immune to most cheats such as damage/speed modification, teleports, noclip, etc. They will generally only have an anticheat to try to mitigate aimbots or xray/wall hacks.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is the thing that annoys me the most about this situation.

They literally only need to check in after a game ends to update the overall planet progress. If something fails after the match, so be it.

But I guess microtransactions gotta microtransaction.

[–] Master@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The game has a global war that is going on. Every game adds or removes capture points from the world you fought on.

They could have let you play without that but everything is tied in including your player advancement.