Fuck Putin!
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
69 points (92.6% liked)
Abolition of police and prisons
336 readers
1 users here now
Abolish is to flourish! Against the prison industrial complex and for transformative justice.
See Critical Resistance's definitions below:
The Prison Industrial Complex
The prison industrial complex (PIC) is a term we use to describe the overlapping interests of government and industry that use surveillance, policing, and imprisonment as solutions to economic, social and political problems.
Through its reach and impact, the PIC helps and maintains the authority of people who get their power through racial, economic and other privileges. There are many ways this power is collected and maintained through the PIC, including creating mass media images that keep alive stereotypes of people of color, poor people, queer people, immigrants, youth, and other oppressed communities as criminal, delinquent, or deviant. This power is also maintained by earning huge profits for private companies that deal with prisons and police forces; helping earn political gains for "tough on crime" politicians; increasing the influence of prison guard and police unions; and eliminating social and political dissent by oppressed communities that make demands for self-determination and reorganization of power in the US.
Abolition
PIC abolition is a political vision with the goal of eliminating imprisonment, policing, and surveillance and creating lasting alternatives to punishment and imprisonment.
From where we are now, sometimes we can't really imagine what abolition is going to look like. Abolition isn't just about getting rid of buildings full of cages. It's also about undoing the society we live in because the PIC both feeds on and maintains oppression and inequalities through punishment, violence, and controls millions of people. Because the PIC is not an isolated system, abolition is a broad strategy. An abolitionist vision means that we must build models today that can represent how we want to live in the future. It means developing practical strategies for taking small steps that move us toward making our dreams real and that lead us all to believe that things really could be different. It means living this vision in our daily lives.
Abolition is both a practical organizing tool and a long-term goal.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I admired him for his bold resistance to the secret police, and his brave exposures of Putin's mansions and hidden wealth. The world mourns with Russia.
I don't mean to speak ill of the dead, but I don't know very much about his personal politics, and have frequently heard that despite his anti-Putin stance that he's politically a Russian chauvinist. I'd like to learn more about his defense of anarchists.
I did not admire him, but did respect him for growing a spine.
I would say - his early political career was tarnished by populism. His first response to the war between Georgia and Russia (characterized by escalation by both sides) was a misguided kneejerk reaction - he was not a competent politician back then.
His responses to the 2014 events in Ukraine are already smarter: a realization that Western sanctions were not serious provoked Navalny to suggest improved sanctions, a realization that Putin had gained great popularity by annexing Crimea caused Navalny to give ambiguous answers to questions about returning Crimea (he suggested a new referendum instead) and finally a realization that relations with Ukraine had been damaged for centuries, resulted in Navalny criticizing Putin for destroying friendly relations. I don't think he was a Russian chauvinist at that point (could have been earlier, though). It seems that he viewed Russians and Ukrainians as brothers, likely because his father was from Ukraine. As a result of Putin's actions, soon enough, reality no longer accommodated that viewpoint.
At some point he started playing hardball and taking risks. Perhaps when Boris Nemtsov was murdered in 2015, perhaps at some other point...
...I think Navalny chose anti-corruption for his banner because polls showed that people cared about corruption - viewed it as a threat to leading a normal life - and those in power were setting records in corruption. I think he didn't choose a more noble banner because polls also showed that people didn't care about principles (I recall a Levada poll where 25% were concerned about corruption, but only 3% about democracy and human rights).
When other oppositoners started going to prison and dying, I think Navalny realized that he needed to help eveyone who opposed Putin. While doing that, he ended up doing provocative things that he was blamed for - like helping far-righters get a permit for a march in Moscow. I would characterize his role as a lawyer - he was a lawyer by education too. When government caused problems for someone, he tried to support these folks, largely without regard to their ideology - as long as they were opponents of Putin.
As for him and anarchists, he couldn't help them much, but didn't stay silent. When the "network" trial ended with convictions in Penza, Navalny commented:
These very young people’s testimony about an imaginary terrorist organization were beaten out using torture,” wrote opposition leader Alexey Navalny in a post to Twitter. “Any minister in the Russian government is 10 times more of a criminal and a threat to society than these guys.”
(he was correct, the accused were indeed tortured)
That's alarming that he helped fascists, but it's nice to hear he spoke the truth about the tortured anarchists.
Thanks for sharing.