this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
259 points (93.0% liked)

News

28314 readers
3692 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wooster@startrek.website 56 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Article mentions nothing with regards to holding corporations accountable nor any plan or threat of action on the president’s part.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

These kinds of comments frustrate me... They fundamentally conflate the presidency with a more king-like position.

The system is setup against him doing anything other than speaking out about the issue and trying to motivate others to do something about it. The president ultimately has little power ... it's more of a oversight/cheer leading position (with some extended powers over the years to deal with imminent issues -- e.g., authorize short term military operations, which is still scary in the wrong hands) while congress is the office workers that are supposed to actually get the law writing done.

Unfortunately, we've had roughly a decade of Republican lead stagnation due to slim majority Democrat representation or outright majority Republican representation -- the Republican platform is after all the "do nothing because more government is bad" platform.

He's doing exactly what he should be doing, using the office to call people out and bring attention to issues/start conversations. That can result in brands either going "... lets make a voluntary change to get the heat off" or the public going "yeah that's a good point calls congressional rep to complain."

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Well put!

The president ultimately has little power … it’s more of a oversight/cheer leading position

And let me emphasize this is a good thing, even if the previous officeholder ignored legal restrictions on his power

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Make it expensive to change the weight of a product. Standardize the size and weight of a given type of product. Require the packaging to alert consumers that the weight have changed in the last year and how much it has changed. Tie the trademark of a given product to a certain weight.

Are these good ideas? I don't know, I literally made them up just now while shitting. I am sure the president of the United States could hire at least one dude to come up with better ones.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All great ideas if it weren't for the fact that we have a court system heavily weighted towards pro-corporate conservatism, so none of that would survive legal challenges and there would be a shit ton of corporate challenges.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Food in general doesn't even go through the FDA, does it? They only get involved if there's a problem. If it was pre approval, it would be a super slow process likely.

Edit: my train of thought was if it needed approval, any size changes would go to a slow line, but in reality, any small company would go to slow lines also, which would truly suck.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I hope your bowl movement went well

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

What are you suggesting he do about it?

Oh don’t expect an answer from that OP. They’re here to blame Biden. It doesn’t matter if there’s anything he can actually do about the issue.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

It's all about lip service. Neither party really gives a shit about the American public.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe -4 points 1 year ago

Of course it doesn't. They probably don't have any actual plan to enforce laws. 🤦

I can't wait until I become High Galactic Overlord of this planet so I can boot those motherfuckers off of a cliff.

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If politicians were serious in their criticism they would vote for laws forcing comparison price to be displayed next to the purchase price.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Require that $/oz is always displayed in equal size as the per package price.

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That's what I meant with "comparison price".

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or just enforce price controls

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Morgoon@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That has never stopped presidents before. In response to inflation in 1971 President Nixon issued an executive order making it illegal to raise prices for several months and before him FDR went even farther with rationing and controlling wages.

Inflation is actually super easy to control. You just need to be willing to threaten business leaders with serious jail time.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, and we see how that worked. The inflation in the 1970s was crazy

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Morgoon@startrek.website -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well TIL, I always thought that executive orders were a way to bypass Congress. I know that there was a Democratic Congress in 1971, I wonder why they rubber stamped that for Nixon.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My opinion is regulate it so any shrinking has to be marked in large bold caps lettering NOW X% SMALLER for at least 1 year. Then people might actually stop buying shrunken goods and opt for a competitor.

[–] Xabis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That won’t solve ingredient swaps.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It'd be better than nothing, though

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Oh, I'm still offering the old size product. It's just less efficient and profitable than our completely new, slightly smaller size.

[–] BritishDuffer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Stop! Or I'll say stop again!

[–] LocoOhNo@lemmus.org 10 points 1 year ago

I was talking to a friend recently and mentioned that Lil Debbie Fudge Rounds used to be the same diameter as the "Double Decker" ones.

Now they're smaller than the diameter of an air hockey puck. And don't even get me started on how regular Oreo Cookies used to look like the double stuff Oreos. The gall to cut the product in half, add the other half back to it, then charge more and have the balls to call it "double..."

[–] Smacks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did he say anything about actually doing something about it? Some-sort of shrinkflation law or something?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm happy to just see him talking about anything other than green line go up.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't mind a reduction in plastic packaging if I could get a few more snacks.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I basically reduced my snack intake by about 75%. It is almost to expensive to snack now.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 1 year ago

90% of the snacks I buy are the store brand. Particularly, Walmart since it's the cheapest place to get foodstuffs here. So far, while all the big names have visibility shrunk in size and value, the store brands have remained the same while just continuing to grow in value compared to the other brands that are giving you less for more.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At what point during the shrink does the packaging cost more than the single serving of potatoe chip fumes?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

As President should do something about the tiny size of Pringles in Australia, which are a sad shadow of their former glory now.