this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
145 points (81.9% liked)

Firefox

17821 readers
78 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean like why? Just open and update when I'm done that's what every other browser does. Stop making me wait to use the Internet firefox!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 104 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Would you prefer:

“Firefox Updater

This app is preventing shutdown”

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, no reason not to. Takes only a couple of seconds to boot, and everything is reset to a clean state.

[–] drawerair@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I started using Windows 11 in December 2023 and tried to just use sleep. My 🔋 drained fast while my 💻 was on sleep. I expected it. AMD and Intel processors generally aren't as efficient as the Apple M soc.

While it was on sleep, there were times it suddenly needed to restart.

I once had a blue screen of death too.

So now, I shut it down most of the time. Windows 11 boot-ups and shutdowns are surprisingly fast. :)

[–] Ineocla@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

It's not just the cpus. Microsoft has a very broken implementation for sleep. I saw an ltt video talking about it and apperently a microsoft employee was able to reproduce the bug. Don't know if there's any news tho

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I got a X570 board with the really loud fan.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Instead of sleep mode, I think they meant.

[–] TurtleTourParty@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

My laptop won't charge from USB-C if the battery fully dies, so I shut it down to prevent that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The better approach would be to prepare the update in the background and swap out the version on the next start

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Isn't that what it does? That's how it works on macOS, and I get prompted to restart on Linux when I install updates in the background.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm on Windows and I don't recall the last time I was inconvenienced by a Firefox update. Like... I can't even remember what it actually does. OP must be running it on a potato or something.

[–] Unreliable@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think they mean when you go to open Firefox (when it updates) it immediately closes and reopens the first time? At least mine does that.

Mine never does, or if it does, it's so fast I don't notice.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah and it only takes seconds on a decent PC.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I thought it did too, but this post says it's different? Maybe they're wrong. I haven't double checked.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think Firefox works like Chrome does here. Both give me a little notice in the menu that a new version is ready, and Chrome is a little more annoying about it (turns yellow, then red). I need both for work, and I much prefer how Firefox does it.

[–] drawerair@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What I noticed – I turned on my 💻, opened Firefox then Firefox was updating. It was fast. So it hasn't been annoying so far.

The only time I've seen that is if I haven't updated in a super long time (e.g. on my Windows partition, which I use like once/year). If I'm using it normally, it installs in the background and I get the new version when I relaunch it. I primarily use macOS (work) and Linux (home), so I guess it's possible my occasional Windows experience is how things normally go, but I think that's a special case for when FF is so out of date that it's unsafe to get without patches.

[–] smotherlove@sh.itjust.works 34 points 8 months ago

I disagree. Software not terminating immediately is grounds for uninstallation. It should update silently while it runs.

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Ubuntu has an even better approach. It updates silently while you are using it. Then your tab crashes. And when you retry it tells you to restart firefox. Truly genius *cheffs kiss

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

How else would you know it was doing anything?

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

As an Arch user. I wanted to use Arch at work too. Well, they want me to use Kubuntu (or any other prefered Ubuntu, but I like KDE so I do what every other dev uses)... except for Home Office ofc. Arch.

Still. I hate this stupid update thing. Suddenly I get 20 notifications of KDE system wanting a reboot because of updates and Firefox doing exactly this.

The worst. When I open a new tab by middleclicking a link, the tab crashes. I restart Firefox and the new Tab is gone forever. Sometimes its easy to get what I saw but not always.

[–] itsnotits@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

chef's* kiss

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm not really hankering for that 4 seconds it takes to restart.

[–] ArtificialLink@lemy.lol 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Takes longer on older hardware

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I’m running a 12 year old laptop with 80 tabs open. Last time I did apt upgrade and had to restart the browser it took about six seconds.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

My T400 and T480 are nearly indistinguishable from my ThinkCentre M70q Gen 2.

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It matters more when you clear history and cookies automatically at close. You lose your entire session.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Then... don't do that? You can clear history and cookies manually really easily, so if you restart your browser less often than Firefox releases updates (every 4 weeks), you're just opening yourself up to hacks by running an insecure browser.

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Huh? I restart firefox multiple times a day, I was simply trying to point out that if you have automated updates and automatic clears of browsing data enabled you'll run into this. I'm not about to start doing so manually just because the browser restarts itself.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can have automatic updates without automatic restarts. I have automatic updates on my work Mac and it never restarts itself. My other computers are Linux, so I control when those get updates.

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can automate linux updates, and this can be enforced through your organization. So, no, it is not always in the users control, like in the case of having unattended upgrades in linux enabled with enterprise software.

Makes sense. I've always had admin access on my Linux boxes, so I haven't read to deal with that.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I don't think I've ever noticed Firefox updating. The only sign I get that it updates is that when it does a special tab opens telling me about the new features.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is what I hate on school computers, and it drives people away from Firefox.
You don't have admin privilege, you can't update, so don't even try.
I always disable auto-updates on those.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago

Just use a a package manager

[–] woodgen@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Applications updating themselves... must be a Windows thing. Didn't they want to copy package management from Linux? Maybe AI can help.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 2 points 8 months ago

I see it like thank you that i don't have to go to Mozilla website and download the installer. So much time saved, and it only takes like 5 second without manually doing anything. On Linux i saw please restart Firefox tab and clicked it. No problem. I got the update fast.

[–] rushaction@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

My issue with FF's auto update is that the behavior is how painfully the auto-update works with multiple profiles.

I'll have one window (well three) open for some (measurable in days) time.

  1. FF updates silently, I haven't restarted my browser so I haven't noticed.
  2. I go to open a session in the second (or third profiles)
  3. FF decides now is a great time to apply the update, after all it just opened right?
  4. All the existing open browsing sessions in the other profiles get bricked. The tabs just stop responding, no browsing works, just dead in the water.

I have to shut it (all?) down to get it working again.

I don't know how Chrome handles this so I cannot compare. TBH still worth using FF over that adware!

[–] daqqad@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Went not just disable automatic updates? Update when you have time for it.

[–] 30p87@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

I kinda have an up-to-date fetish, otherwise I wouldn't use Arch testing everywhere, so every time I boot up my PC I instinctively update the system, including firefox, despite that I am already using it.

load more comments
view more: next ›