Just think of all the cases where the people are not faking stuff in such an obvious way. When they know to just add a bit of noise or not outright use the same picture but modify it here and there etc. Fuck it is so wide spread and we still do not value ~~copying~~ reproducing results nearly as much as new results.
Science
General discussions about "science" itself
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
Read up on Alzheimer research, a case where a fake study determined direction of research for years.
Autofill is a bad way to interpolate data. If you're going to do it, you gotta have an idea of how to do it more realistically and obviously comment on the choice.
I can imagine him doing this without even noticing how much data he made up. When a spreadsheet is big enough that the filtered parameters take up more than a screen, you don't really notice if you autofill 100 or 1000 or 100000 lines. It's just "top to bottom" anyway.
This is one reason why I haven't been using Excel for years. I encourage everyone to use Python or R for analysing data.
From the immortal Journal of Irreproducible Results, "The Data Enrichment Method": ". . .its principal shortcoming is that before the enrichment process can be started, some data must be collected. It is quite true that a great deal is done with very little information, but this should not blind one to the fact that the method still embodies the 'raw-data flaw'. The ultimate objective, complete freedom from the inconvenience and embarrassment of experimental results, still lies unattained before us."