this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
88 points (97.8% liked)

United Kingdom

4040 readers
36 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A recent poll found that 22% of UK voters are still not aware that they will need to carry a form of photographic ID, which is a requirement after Rishi Sunak’s Government brought in a new law forcing voters to carry one of a limited number of approved IDs in order to vote.

The legislation was rushed through despite almost no evidence of in-person voting fraud in the UK.

all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

There are many of the opinion that voter ID is a solution for a problem that barely exists. This article is an interesting insight.

Voter ID has been described as a poisoned cure.

[–] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Gerrymandering is changing electoral boundaries to improve the chances of the ruling party.

Voter ID seems to work fine in Northern Ireland too. The thing with in-person voting fraud is that it's incredibly difficult to detect.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well they brought in voter ID last election and it didn't significantly change the outcome of the election so I would say that that is itself evidence that voter fraud is not happening. Since if it was this ID would have prevented it and we would have noticed a significant difference in the results.

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago

Exactly. This is not gerrymandering.

However it is also unnecessary. You say it's hard to detect in person voter fraud, however every professional analysis of voter fraud has determined that it does not happen in any significant manner. The sole purpose of this is to prevent voting, not to prevent fraudulent voting.