this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)

196

16371 readers
1927 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Someboynumber5reborn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate the sub urbs, either go full urban or rural none of this cat dependant crap

[–] ichmagrum@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I, too, hate being subject to the feline overlords.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

I also far prefer dom urbs.

[–] Xeelee@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

If you allow businesses in residential neighborhoods, "those" people might come there! The horror!

[–] reverie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Every house essentially having a small storefront space attached. But it’s just to park a car

[–] notExactlyI20@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In Latin america is pretty much the norm that in small neighborhoods there is at least 2 to 3 small stores in ppl's houses. I dunno about the US, but it can definetly help with the "car everywhere" culture, the enviroment and why not? also letting people getting some extra bucks by providing their neighbors with stuff they probably don't want to buy in huge quantities or are too lazy to drove to the store for.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In America it's illegal to run a store out of your house because white people hate minorites.

[–] notExactlyI20@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

But it's your house !?

I'm no lawyer or anything, but isn't there a law that lets you do whatever the fuck you want to your house (something along the line of "castle bla bla bla doctrine"?

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That only let's you shoot people, not sell them bread.

[–] notExactlyI20@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh ok, my bad.

[–] GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

That would be too much freedom for the "land of the free".

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but like others have said there are zoning laws, but more importantly these suburbs are almost always included with HOA (Home Owner Association) and when you buy the house you are required to accept the covenants of the HOA where your house sits, however what makes this even worse is that most states give WAY too much power to HOA's to the point where if you are doing something that does not comply with the HOA covenants, you can be subjected to fines, getting sued, or even have your house foreclosed on by the HOA.

I love the freedom I get in America

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

No that's only for shooting minorities

[–] Butters@lemmywinks.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We have something called zoning laws. Some people here are blaming racism for these laws. Maybe that’s partially true, not entirely sure. But there are definitely other reasons.

Like you’re not supposed to put a factory next to a school. A few years ago there was a huge factory explosion in Texas and because of their shitty zoning it affected some school in the area. Can’t remember if kids died in that.

[–] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 3 points 1 year ago

i don't doubt that racism is a component to this, but there's also the part where breaking up the monotone suburban hellscape would make it "unsafe for kids". people move to suburbs with the specific purpose of having kids, so the place is designed to be inescapable without a car but with no clear signs of confinement, just an endless continuation of the same sanitized space. then when said kids are old enough to trust they can learn to drive in the same environment and only then released from the tutorial world they're safely stuck into whenever they come "home"

but yes, also, god forbid your children have to meet minorities or poor people, and since small shops don't pay well and have the audacity to employ non-white people, the only way is to cut them out. you can pick your shit up at the gas station, if you're an adult.

[–] JackRiddle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know if zoning laws were actually caused by racism, but they were and are definitely used to disadvantage racial minorities.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Remember, it's the land of freedom!

[–] gaybear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The fucking white and black cars, jesus...

[–] Johandea@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed, it would wreck the neighborhood. Wreck it for the better.

[–] itsmistermoon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reminds me more to Edward Scissorhands’ neighbour

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Was thinking the same thing.

Ironically, a hairdresser. The pastels would probably be too colorful for op's hood.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No, opening residential to commercial property would ruin it. One business won't...the droves of others will.

[–] ichmagrum@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Businesses don't usually just completely overrun entire neighborhoods, and "opening" doesn't mean "do whatever the fuck you want". You can still specify that you don't want night clubs or auto shops in a specific place.

Mixed zoning is the norm in Europe, and it sure as fuck doesn't ruin any neighborhoods, quite the opposite in fact.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Canada too. I lived on top of a tattoo and vape store across the street from a cafe and grocery store. There were rules to keep the face of the buildings looking kept up.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I was struggling to understand this thread as a European running my business from my home, in my case I'm more of a "go visit" than "receive visits" but I also know of others in the neighborhood that do hairdressing, electronics repairs, etc.

I also have multiple supermarkets in walking distance...

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's funny, because mixed use zoning is some of the most desirable places to live in terms of market value. People don't want to drive for. Every. Single. Thing.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The argument against mixed use is often that they don't want to be forced to live in a mixed use area, but the same people are fine with forcing everyone to live how they want. Most likely they only want single family homes because they have never experienced good mixed use and can't imagine how great it is.

[–] drktrts@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

it’s as if you think the alternative is businesses being like “alright boys, suburbs are on the menu”.

of course there’ll be regulation, mixed use zoning doesn’t mean chaos.