this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

196

16459 readers
1766 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravelsDrachma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

3.0's about blockchain; the problem you're describing is like, late-stage 2.0. not to defend the app fetish or advocate for 3.0 by any means, lord no

[–] fiasco@possumpat.io 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's even more perplexing than that... One version of Web 3.0 is the crypto fantasy of being nickel-and-dimed for every single little thing. There's another, older Web 3.0 concept proposed by Tim Berners-Lee called the semantic web.

[–] gravelsDrachma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we should ban naming things

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

No more naming things, you were given fingers, use them to point at things.

[–] Gormadt@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly to me it seems like the harder these massive Web 2.0 corps push for Web3 and trashing their services for an ever increasing profit margin the more I think that a Web 3.0 won't be Blockchain, but I think it will be something decentralized.

The web is increasingly experienced exclusively through social media and with the building of more decentralized services (and the gaining traction) the more I think a decentralized social media future may be unfolding.

I'm for it, I support FOSS for sure.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

And the app is literally just a browser that opens up the mobile site. Oh and it needs access to your contacts, messages, camera, microphone, pictures, files, and call logs!