this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
178 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19136 readers
2027 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 166 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Congress has no oversight of state prosecutors. Jordan is using his position of power and trust to pervert the course of justice. This is blatant obstruction of justice.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 85 points 9 months ago

Nobody has to honor a subpoena from the House Republicans because Jim ignores subpoenas and has shown there are zero consequences for doing so

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 51 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps she should indict him for obstruction so we can have a good old standoff?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lovely idea! Fani are you listening?

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think I've ever seen the words Jordan and trust together before.

[–] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Not the first the time gym jordan tried to hide some criminals.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 109 points 9 months ago

Man who defied a congressional subpoena sends congressional subpoena in a small government bid to illegally impose oversight of a court he does not have jurisdiction over to interfere with the upcoming election by attempting to deprive the voters of the knowledge of the criminality of one of the candidates.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 72 points 9 months ago (1 children)

House subpoenas can be ignored. They proved that a while back.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

They're also negotiable.

She should tell them that she's happy to show up and answer some questions in exchange for sworn testimony in her case.

I would be curious to see the breakdown of GOP reps who would immediately agree, who would immediately reject the proposal, and who would be fine with agreeing to get what they want then turning around and either refusing to cooperate or simply blatantly commit perjury in an attempt to shield their orange overlord.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 60 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just like in a video game: When you keep meeting increasingly stronger enemies, it means you're going the right direction.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 34 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And when the level boss starts puffing up and keeps getting redder and redder, it means you're winning.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And if anyone knows what not complying with a House investigation is, it's Gym Jordan!

[–] stown@sedd.it 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why do people keep spelling his name like it's short for gymnasium?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Because he's a former coach who used his position to facilitate CSA, resulting in the victims seeing no justice. It's a reminder to anyone reading that he's a piece of shit who uses his position of power to cover for criminals and abusers, as he is still doing.

ETA: when he cries foul over judicial impropriety or "protecting the children," he's the very person he's talking about.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Lol. Get ready for chest pumping, sound byting, and personal attacks - basically anything that will discredit Fani Willis. As if her personal affair is an absolution for republican election treason.

Oh and Gym should not be in any business issuing subpoenas since he himself has dodged one from the same committee he now chairs. Prostitutes should not give lectures about the virtues of virginity.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

While I may agree with your sentiment, the closing analogy is a bit off. Prostitutes, being sex workers, would have at the very least a working familiarity with both sides of the virginity argument, whereas nuns would have no grounds to argue either side — no matter how rusted shut they are for Jesus.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hahaha, the subpoena is literally meaningless thanks to the GOP, good luck with that shit

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Noooooo! Rules for thee, but not for me :(

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They know she doesn’t have a dick, right?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Actually, MTG wants to hold up an image of Fani's huge hog.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I still contend that MTG is just Dog the Bounty Hunter in drag.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Charge him, fanny

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan has subpoenaed District Attorney Fani Willis of Fulton County, Georgia, demanding documents from her office following allegations that Willis fired a whistleblower who tried to stop a top campaign aide from misusing federal funds.

The subpoena, obtained by NBC News, is part of a broader probe by Jordan, R-Ohio, and House Republicans into whether Willis used federal funds in conducting her more-than-two-year investigation into former President Donald Trump, who was indicted in Fulton County last year on charges that he attempted to overturn Georgia’s 2020 presidential election results.

In a letter Friday, Jordan says Willis has failed to comply with two earlier requests for documents related to her office’s use of federal grant money.

Willis' office has condemned Jordan's requests, writing last year in a letter to him that there is “no justification in the Constitution for Congress to interfere with a state criminal matter.”

Jordan's push for documents follows allegations that the district attorney's office retaliated against an employee who tried to stop what she said was misuse of Justice Department grant funding by a top Willis campaign aide.

Two months later, the employee was “abruptly terminated” and “escorted out of her office by seven armed investigators,” Jordan's letter says, quoting the report.


The original article contains 450 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!