59
Iowa Republicans want public schools to hire untrained Christian chaplains
(www.friendlyatheist.com)
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
59 points (95.4% liked)
Atheism
1662 readers
1 users here now
- Be respectful to other members Treat others with kindness and courtesy, even if you disagree with their opinions.
- Stay on topic Keep your discussions relevant to the purpose of the forum. Avoid going off-topic or derailing conversations.
- No spamming Avoid posting irrelevant or unnecessary content, advertisements, or links to unrelated websites.
- Use proper language and tone Choose your words carefully when commenting or replying to others. Avoid using profanity or engaging in offensive language and personal attacks.
- Do not share personal information Protect your privacy by refraining from sharing personal details such as addresses, phone numbers, or email addresses on the forum.
- Report any issues If you come across any inappropriate behavior or content, report it to the forum moderators or administrators.
- Have fun and contribute positively Participate actively and add value to the discussions. Engage in meaningful and constructive conversations with fellow members.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Christianity is truly a dying religion.
If this is a "solution" to get more people to become faithful.
Of course they want stupid ubtrained people in schools, so the kids learn jack shit and turn to religion...
Iowa republicans probably also higher untrained rent boys named Christian.
This sounds like a potential disaster waiting to happen for child sexual abuse.
When the only protective filter to children in schools is 'they passed a background check', that is just asking for trouble.
That is not to say all these 'untrained Christian chaplains' will be sexual predators; by and far, I'm sure most of them will be fine people, albeit a bit religiously zealous, but that doesn't mean it wont happen.
Passing a background check doesn't mean you're not a sexual predator, it just means you haven't been caught yet, or you haven't been put in a position that you would act on those impulses yet if you have them. It doesn't matter the profession, this is always a risk, but at least limiting the pool of applicants to professionally trained personnel limits the risk.
I feel like this is one of those things that people will shout 'how could we have known', when it was obvious from the start. If this passes, and an incident occurs, those pushing the bill, and that voted for it should be held legally liable for child endangerment, and any reparations for harm caused. It's just bad policy.