this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
281 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

60048 readers
3289 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 111 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This bill must be funded by VPN services because anyone who thinks teens won’t figure out a workaround has never tried to stop teens from anything. Disobeying is what they do on an evolutionary level.

[–] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also using sites such as "This Person Doesn't Exist" to generate am AI pic of a human could be used for profile pics.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

You can make an instagram account fine with bing dall-e too.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 15 points 11 months ago

Good, the kids could use the tech experience

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 57 points 11 months ago

Sounds totally enforceable!

[–] soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It would also require that social media sites use "reasonable age verification methods" to verify users' ages.

Please no :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This is very obviously unenforceable

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At least not without major violations to privacy.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It's a feature

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yep. It's a direct violation of freedom of speech fair one thing.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure it is. Platforms could for example close online sign ups and make people go to a physical location to open an account. Just like with banks. This of course will not pass but the issue is not that you can't enforce age limit. Banks do it. Online banks also do it. The issue is that enforcing this would kill the platforms.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ive never once had to walk into a bank in my life and I’ve used 6 online banks in my lifetime lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The smarter kids will just go in and change their bday or create a new account that has them old enough. The only way to prevent that is to make them verify ID on every single person logging in from a Florida based ip or is a resident. But, what about those who are traveling from other states, should they also be forced to upload ID? I'm going to say no.

[–] DreamTraveler@lemm.ee 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

NOBODY should have to to upload any sort of ID to use the internet. The issue began when corporations started getting involved. Fuck Ajit Pai, Ethan Zuckerman and the political world all tied to this. Amazon is trying to force people to upload ID for refunds.. pathetic.

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Oh I wholly agree. The point of that was to illustrate what you have to do to enforce it properly. It's the same as trying to force porn sites to ID their users.

As for Amazon, I have not heard anything about this and I recently did a couple of returns with no request for my license. Also, you may not be aware but stores like home depot already require ID to return items and they (with the help of a 3rd party) keep a credit file of sorts on you and uses that determine who has been abusing the return process.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If it's illegal in the state for residents then it will be illegal for those traveling too

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure you follow. I'm postulating whether or not say facebook would have to lock someones account and force them to upload ID because they happened to have browsed it while inside the state. This would not be looked upon kindly by other states.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

what a fucking dogshit state. not that social media is good for anyone, but restricting kids from one of their main forms of communication / news / outlet to the world is just designed to be obnoxious.

even best case scenario, active malice aside, these people somehow have zero memory of what it was like to be a kid; having to wake up for school at 6am and do endless homework for no material benefit, and now this

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Question: How old are you?

Social media wasn't known until I was 16(?) and I'm a millennial. So no these people did not grow up with social media as most politicians are older than me.

It's insane you think kids today need social media like they need exercise, fun and oxygen.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I would suggest that it didn't happen in its most well known form until we were older (MySpace launched just after I graduated high school), but it did exist. Communities and message boards were a thing before MySpace and Facebook.

Kids today do need a sense of community. And we have enshittified the outside so much that they aren't likely to get that spending time in public. How far will this spread? Social media isn't just Instagram, or xitter, or the like. It's also things like steam, or video game forums, or anything with a chat feature. Kids make meaningful connections with others this way. Not all social media is bad.

How many afterschool clubs still exist? How many group activities are catered around school (but not school) these days that aren't sports? Where is the place that is for kids in our communities?

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 16 points 11 months ago

No one should be banned from equal internet access for any reason. 🤦🤦🤦

See, this is why I hate DeSantis and the right wing. They crow about freedom of speech from one end and shit crap like this out of the other.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

For once Florida is doing something good.

At least it would be if they weren't simply doing this to prevent kids from becoming more informed.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Eh… yes and no. On the one hand, kids are undoubtedly addicted to social media, and their screen time should be limited for the sake of their mental health.

On the other hand, this is absolutely not going to limit most kids time on social media. They aren’t idiots, and some of them are (properly) tech savvy. Meaning a bunch of kids are going to find an easy workaround, and spread that info around.

And this is almost certainly going to result in an ID requirement similar to the laws requiring ID for porn sites in certain companies. And unlike PornHub, I don’t trust that Facebook, Twitter, Reddit or the others are going to actually have integrity when it comes to ID laws.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Solution: nobody should be on social media.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Lemmy is social media… any site we communicate through is social media, even old style forums are social media. Hell, even Stack Exchange could be considered social media. Should those be banned?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I didn’t say they should be banned. People just shouldn’t be on them. It’s bad for mental health. It’s like smoking but for your brain.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

Eh… social media isn’t harmful on its own in moderation. It’s companies that game the system against their users to feedback loop rage and hate that’s the real issue.

Though the addiction is real af, I do admit that.

[–] thoughts3rased@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

I'd agree if the ban extended to news articles online.

It doesn't.

[–] Maruki_Hurakami@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What is Gaetz going to do?

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Nothing will change. The adult filters didn't work 30+ years ago and they don't work now.

I see at least 2 ways around this depending on how it's implemented.

  1. Either update age info to be "old enough"

Or

  1. Use a vpn that has you accessing it from anywhere but Florida.

This is just one more waste of time that will be struck down by a court assuming it makes into law.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ombremad@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago

Can't go on the Internet, can't go in public restrooms... Land of freedom.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 months ago

Well, it's about 15 years too late, but I guess better to have this discussion now than never.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Bah they’ll just do it in secret instead of openly.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Internet too dangerous. Florida, just ban it entirely, just to be extra safe.

[–] JudiDench@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

First Amendment violation

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Why don't they just tax the websites you access? VPNs would go crazy

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Wow, broken clock and all that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

I can get behind the spirit of the bill, but I wouldn’t hold my breath when it comes to enforcement.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Waiting to see how these apps do the malicious compliance thing. Because I think that's probably what's going to happen.

load more comments
view more: next ›