this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
80 points (96.5% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2423 readers
38 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

!abolition@slrpnk.net

!acab@lemmygrad.ml

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember, it's very easy to announce something, keep an eye on them to make sure they follow through

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not a victory until I can self host.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

**this is a victory in that your neighbors camera won't get you arrested for what you do at your own front door, assuming it's not bullshit. there's almost no overlap between ring customers and people that want to self host their cameras. ring will never be for that, there are other products for that. this is just good because of all the cameras we don't control.

ring sells convenience. they sell ease of use. people that buy ring do so because it's one of the first camera systems that's as easy to set up as an Amazon alexa, which they also have, because they don't think about digital privacy.

just because this isn't the perfect fantasy outcome that we had wet dreams about doesn't mean this isn't good.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

*thats if you believe their words.

there is no way to verify they are saying the truth, so might as well have said nothing.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Victory! Ring Announces They Won't Tell You They Are Facilitating Police Requests Anymore

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah you're comment is spot on. This will just become an apparatus for parallel construction instead of primary evidence

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The battle for consumer privacy is trench warfare. You have to fight for every inch. This is a positive even though it's not a perfect outcome

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

But this isn't a law. Companies say all kinds of baseless shit and outright lies. Quite frankly, I don't believe them.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

this is just a company saying unverifiable things so they can sell you shit.

we won nothing.