this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

196

16484 readers
1847 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DingleBoone@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

This is like saying, "Why can't we all just pretend counterfeit money is real?" Sure, it sounds like a nice simple solution until suddenly everyone prints counterfeit money and expects to buy things that no one is producing now that an easier option has appeared.

[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can appreciate the spirit of this post, but it's a perspective only a teenager could hold.

[–] ondoyant@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

people should not starve. we have the resources to ensure nobody starves. it isn't a naive statement, its a moral imperative.

[–] jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's the ultimate midwit take. Smart enough to realise it's an abstraction, not smart enough to realise that there's a base reality (goods themselves being scarce) beneath it.

[–] Platomus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Food isn't scarce.

[–] JVT038@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm, but why would a farmer provide food to people without getting anything in return? This is, assuming everyone is selfish, which is the core assumption of capitalism.

[–] SattaRIP@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Economics and unrealistic assumptions, name a nore iconic duo.

[–] JVT038@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well I mean, most of the liberal and classical economists generally try to predict the behaviors of consumers, which lead to assumptions such as "People will generally be selfish".

[–] Platomus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Because they're put in an economic system where if they aren't - they starve.