this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
209 points (86.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26980 readers
1245 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I find that i can spot AI Images fairly easily these days, especially the sort of fantastical tableaus that get posted to the various AI communities around lemmy. I'm tired of seeing them; it all looks the same to me. Was wondering if im being too sensitive, or if other people are similarly bored of the constant unimaginative AI spam...

For the record, I block any explicit AI Art communities that pop up in the feed, but there are more every day...

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hate hate hate hate it, I'd be happy if they were all banned, tbh.

This is prolly gonna be a hot take but the only reason I don't block AI art communities is so that I can downvote them whenever I see an AI art post. Yes, I'm that petty, and no, I don't give a shit.

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I think it's not cool unless it's funny. I'm trying to think of a good philosophical reason for that. I agree most of the time I am annoyed and don't even look at them, scrolling past as if they were advertising.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Some of it's really gross looking

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Nah, keep them coming. I've seen the sunset from my window hundreds of times, it's still pretty.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe 1 in 10 AI generated images posted here I look at that are any interest to me.

Most character mashups outside of a handful aren't very interesting (the pokemon museum one was neat). Most are kinda meh, but don't bother me as at least with my current settings only a few AI art communities appear on my feed.

[–] Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Just out of curiosity, which new ones have you seen today? I've noticed ai images being included in parts of memes, but it's mostly been as a replacement for low effort photoshopping.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

A few is fine, if AI pics appear in my feed more than that, then it does annoy me.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

No, it's too much of a spectrum/hierarchy to be so absolute about it.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

AI art is a turn off for me. Not just for how it looks, but how it disrespects the works of millions of artists and its users complete disregard to their welfare.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Just think of all those copyists the printing press put out of work. We should have abolished the printing press and gone back to hand copying.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is unlawful to copy, reproduce, and or distribute copyrighted works using a printing press without the express permission of the author or creator.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Unless of course the author made it before an arbitrary date in time, or if they failed to follow every single rule required to copyright it, or if they were a citizen of a country that didn't have a treaty in place, or if the owner is a corporation and it hasn't been a billion years since the author died, or if the estate of the author was split between more than one person and a subset agrees but the others do not...

That's the thing with this crap. It is all based on what the very wealthy wanted not based on what helped artists and not based on what made sense. So of course the Church of Scientology can keep religious texts away from the public, of course Disney will always own Mickey Mouse, of course some small poor culture doesn't have a right to a single dime from the marketing of their heritage, off course the general public doesn't have a right to their own culture, and of course it is perfectly fine to endlessly sell something you didn't create because the publisher messed up a word in a legal blurb.

It's a shit system and I won't defend a shit system. I wonder why you do.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because I empathize with people who’ve spent their life learning a trade, honing a skill that are facing poverty because people have found a turbo charged way to steal their work and not pay them.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right very noble of you. I mean that in a non-snarky way.

So let me ask you: under the current system are artists doing well? I just checked the BLS and simple math shows that 0.04% of the US population writes for a living. The country producing the most magazines+news stories+TV+movies+blogs+etc. only pays 0.04% of its population a wage enough to do this full-time. To give you an idea of scale 0.45% of the US population works for Walmart. Go to a Walmart and if you see 11 employees standing there there is one writer.

This is the problem with nostalgia. It makes you pine for a world that never existed to begin with. There wasn't some Golden Age where artists were free and paid well that we need to suppress tech to recover. Being a creative has always been a shit show. And yeah it sucks but it isn't like it didn't suck a year ago.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is pivoting away from the issue: companies are training AI on professional artwork owned by professional artists without compensation, permission or attribution. The leaders of Open AI recently admitted that being unable to use copyrighted materials would mean they wouldn’t be able to offer a meaningful service.

They openly admit that they have to disregard the ownership of others property—that others spent their time to create and depend on for their livelihood—in order to make money themselves. That should be the end of it if we cared about the impact technology has on strangers we don’t know. Instead we selfishly say that’s progress.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

ownership

If I copy your idea are you poorer in the same way as I take your tangible property?

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You’re not arguing in good faith. We’re not talking about ideas, we’re talking about work that takes hours if not days.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

And you are not answering questions

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I enjoy them. They're usually quite creative, and I'm constantly amazed at what the technology can accomplish. I frequently forget that I can turn to DALL-E when I want pictures of specific things, and those posts remind me.

[–] sugarfree@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Not at all, continue!

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

Yes. Icky colors.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›