this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1230 points (84.4% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
3375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M_Reimer@lemmy.world 646 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Can we just pretend that Twitter no longer exists?

All that Elon Musk still tries here is how far he has to go until Twitter finally collapses.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 313 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Also, can we stop polluting the tech comms with this crap? Why are people posting this stuff here again? We were perfectly fine for awhile with no musk Twitter shit posts.

[–] Spike@feddit.de 95 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just block it. Wait, no, that "feature" makes no sense.

Non-shitpost: I know everyone is annoyed by now, but Ex-Twitter is a huge website and relevant?

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Relevant to what?

This conversation has had is back and forth far too many times. Twitter spam is not relevant to technology news. Him not blocking people has no barring on any form of new tech. It belongs in the !nomoremuskspam@lemmy.world comms, that's why that was created.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

YES PLEASE. I fucking swear it genuinely feels like about 15% of the posts here are about Elon.

People need to ignore this prick and move on with their lives

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 217 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Literally every single day we have idiots doing Musk's PR work for free.

Downvote Musk spam. The billionaire doesn't need your help making sure his businesses stay in the 24 hour news cycle.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You think being inevitably forced to see every bit of harassment and spam is going to make that platform more popular and financially viable? Nah, if anything this is free advertising for Mastodon.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 186 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

What in the actual fuck does he think is going to happen

[–] uwe@lemmy.world 214 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I have him blocked. It's my fault. He noticed and now he is going to axe the whole feature

[–] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I could actually seeing that being the reason he’s doing this. Nothing a narcissist hates more than people ignoring them.

[–] BrudderAaron@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is PRECISELY the reason. He fired a lead engineer who told him they can't control how many people engage with his tweets. So he made it so that EVERYONE gets to see his tweets in their feed. Queue mass blocking of him and now he's upset.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jsveiga@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 year ago (5 children)

He's going to be able to harass everyone that had blocked him.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chenzo@lemmy.world 169 points 1 year ago (21 children)

So... Wait.

This means someone can just @ someone else and destroy their feed with hate or dick pics or whatever?!

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'll bet doxxing is allowed now too, there's no way he has people to stop that.

[–] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

Mr. "assassination coordinates" said he was going to live stream driving to Zucks house to fight him, which would effectively doxx Zuck. Expecting logical consistency is silly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like people should start setting up nasty ass porn bots and have them spam Musk constantly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 167 points 1 year ago

"it makes no sense" literally every social media site in existence has the block feature, and the reason is to help people prevent harassment. Elon is like a fucking toddler, it's obvious he just wants to get rid of blocking because he's pissy about being blocked by other people.

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 122 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The block "feature" is a required tool for being listed on the Google and Apple stores, among others.

Removing it will get Twitter delisted from them as well.

[–] PBCrisps@lemmy.world 108 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Just stop using Twitter. It's easy.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 107 points 1 year ago
[–] jenniebuckley@lemmy.world 105 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean it's literally in the terms and conditions of both the App Store and Play Store for social media to have a block button lol

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Elon complaining about some conspirancy on why their app got taken down for not complying.

[–] stochasticity@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago

This is incredibly consistent with the "free speech" crowd thinking free speech entitles you to an audience.

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 95 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Unreal. It's not even incompetence, he really is just tanking the site on purpose.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No he's not.

He's a right wing grifter and always has been. And like many on the right, he views harassment as a form of "free speech" which should be acceptable.

He's not tanking the site on purpose. He's tanking it because his bullshit ideology naturally results in creating a hostile environment that people don't want to be a part of.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 83 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The block feature is not there out of the goodness of their CEO's heart.

It is there to limit liability from harassment. After all, why police harassment laws at your expense. When you can get the end user to enforce it for you.

It's just Dumb evil.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (12 children)

This is so dumb, what is he thinking? What's the angle?

Dumbness aside, Twitter is only usable if you block all of the blue check spammers who add nothing to any discussion.

Maybe he's doing it so you can't block blue checks? But it still doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lmao this is going to be incredible to watch unfold. I am assuming Elon himself has blocked an absolute fuckton of accounts that are just out to troll him, so either he’s gonna (rightly) get absolutely inundated by trolls, or he’s gonna make the devs disable it for everyone except him and whoever else he wants to give that feature to.

[–] notatoad@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, elon's not going to see the negative consequences of this personally, because he'll just use the "ban" button instead of the "block" button.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shashi154263@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yup. X makes no sense. Please delete it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] st33lb0ne@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I cant wait for Twitter/X to cease to exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

“Mr. Billionaire Tech Company CEO, what was your detailed reasoning for the removal of a highly important feature that benefits way more users than the ones it harms?”

“It makes no sense”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PenguBlue@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hasn't Elon blocked people before tho? And even been public when blocking some people?

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 34 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, he's going to be able to keep it doing in the meantime it becomes a premium feature.

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Huh, I have never been a fan of blocking people, but this is a very dumb move, normal Twitter news of course.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Blocking people is essential, I've blocked tons of people and communities on here already

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] oryx@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just when you think he's run out of stupid decisions to make, he does it again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Smacks@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (10 children)

He'll make it a premium feature

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] donuts@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I recommend just blocking the entirely of Xwitter. Your life will be better off.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He is actually, seriously saying "I don't get it, so it must be bad/unnecessary"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this man actually retarded or is he trolling us? Seems like he's intentionally shitting on Twitter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He is really attempting to run it into the ground isn't he?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›