this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
434 points (98.4% liked)

News

23275 readers
3454 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Destinee Thompson was supposed to be on her way to lunch with her stepmother in August 2021 when Colorado police, mistaking her for a robbery suspect, fatally shot the pregnant mother as she fled in her minivan.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 123 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Snelling added that the agency later discovered Thompson had warrants out for her arrest and the autopsy found illicit drugs in her system.

Man, I hate it when the cops bring up this irrelevant bullshit. All they’re trying to do is make the victim look less sympathetic, and make themselves look less bad in comparison. Even if the officers had known about the warrants and drugs, these facts don’t make it okay to gun a woman down.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I wish reporters would flip this on the cops. "Two officers, with no active warrants, killed a woman."

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go even further.

Two officers, one of which had 7 public complaints in their file, killed an unarmed pregnant women

[–] Slwh47696@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Two racist, wife beating police officers murdered a woman"

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

racist, wife beating

police

What's with the redundancy?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diurnambule@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

Two officers, with two active affairs for abuse of power, killed a women

[–] sawdustprophet@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

I wish reporters would flip this on the cops. "Two officers, with no active warrants, killed a woman."

I've seen this headline a few times.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Remember when a cop broke into Botham Jean's apartment and shot him in the face while he was sitting on his own couch eating ice cream? Remember when afterward they had a press conference to show off the <1 gram of marijuana they found just in case that made him a bad person who deserved to die.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah they had no reasonable suspicion to target her.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BongRipsMcGee420@lemmy.world 122 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Funny how "fatally shot" takes the sting out of "gunned down" or "killed".

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Murdered Two Innocent People." Allegedly. But also actually.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

And it's so easy to get around that too. Just say "the Police killed a woman..." That is an absolute fact. Not saying murder which is a crime that they haven't yet been found guilty of.

[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Died due to complications around a lead allergy. Yea, journalists are super bad about passive headlines around the roving police gangs murdering folks. Reform begins with using appropriate language.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

"heavy metal poisoning"

"Haemorrhagic issue" (i.e. bled to death on the kerb)

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Officer-adjacent ballistic event resulted in a cessation of vitality in a non-suspect personage

They take your life in the street, then they take your humanity at the press conference.

[–] plain_and_simply@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Too ambiguous. Plus the photo makes it seem like she lived! WTF

[–] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@MicroWave

They murdered her because they thought she was a shoplifter?????

In what universe did it become ok to murder anyone for shoplifting???????

#ACAB always and forever

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Doesn't matter how small the crime is or how unthreatening the suspect is. Failure to comply is cause for any and all escalation.

"Ready for the pop? Here comes the pop!" Cops laugh, fist-bump while rewatching bodycam video of their dislocating shoulder of 73 y.o. woman with dementia

We heard about that first when it happened, and nothing at all was done when it was just some old lady hurt. (edit: Even with bodycam) THEN the laughing video came out a few days later and THEN the public outcry ramped up enough they had no choice. Only then was there any action against those officers.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

But… but… she used a knife! She backed into an inanimate object! That made her an immediate, deadly threat!

Edit: that was sarcasm, folks. Jeez.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MicroWave@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Frustrated by the district attorney’s decision last year not to charge the officers, Thompson’s family filed a wrongful death and excessive force lawsuit on Tuesday against five officers from the Denver suburb of Arvada who were present when she was killed.

[–] samuraipizzacat420@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (19 children)

I don't like "the shoot first, ask questions later" mentality. I always thought a cop should be a white knight. They need to be ready to throw down their lives to save someone. A us vs them mentality, the fact the police are people and some have families and their own wants and needs will mess with anyone's line of thinking. Police have to be ready to risk opening the door to confirm a dangerous suspect before they use force to try and save themselves.

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't know why so many people seem to forget this, but cops aren't supposed to shoot guilty people either.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago

Judge Dredd was suppose to be cynical satire not something we actually want

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then maybe we should have actual standards for who becomes a cop? But that'd leave us with no cops. Problem solved?

[–] QHC@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

the fact the police are people and some have families and their own wants and needs will mess with anyone’s line of thinking.

Almost like they should be carefully evaluated and trained to make sure they can properly handle tense situations.

Police have to be ready to risk opening the door to confirm a dangerous suspect before they use force to try and save themselves.

Not if they are protected by every level of the system from any possible consequences. So much easier to just assume all citizens are a potential enemy and go in gun's blazing. Just to be safe (for themselves).

[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Except the supreme court ruled they have no duty to protect so no theyre not white knights. Literally roving gangs of thugs at this point

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

fact the police are people and some have families and their own wants and needs will mess with anyone’s line of thinking.

As human beings with families and wants and needs they should have the empathy to realize their escalations are going to end or permanently change the state of someone else's life. They are the trained professionals.

The person they are trying to talk to could be stupid, deaf, high, mentally challenged, terrified, in the midst of a panic attack or breakdown from other causes, or any of a million other things that will cause them to not comply as expected.

Once she was in the car, block her in, call for backup. While you wait for them do one of the tens of other possible choices I'm not taking the time to list right now to immobilize the vehicle without smashing a window and putting a potentially innocent person deeper into their very human, very biological fight or flight response.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thompson, sitting in her minivan and surrounded by five officers, locked the doors and refused to get out, repeating, “It wasn’t me,” the district attorney wrote in the 2022 letter explaining their decision not to charge the officers.

One officer smashed the passenger window with a baton, and Thompson backed the car up, hitting a police vehicle parked behind her. She then drove forward over the curb and onto the road.

One officer began shooting, according to the district attorney’s letter, because he believed another officer was struck by the car or being dragged under it, and eventually shot and killed Thompson. Her unborn child also died.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right out of the playbook.

  1. Terrify and/or physically attack the suspect.
  2. When the suspect responds as all humans do to being terrified or attacked:
  3. Ramp up the use of force, and if you don't kill them you at least get to add resisting arrest or assaulting an officer.
  4. No worries if you've destroyed someone's life, permanently decreased their overall health, or killed them. The taxpayers will pay the inevitable settlement, and there's almost no chance of criminal charges.
[–] Otakulad@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget it mentions she had warrants and illicit drugs in her system. Because then that justifies the shooting after the fact.

Right right, I left out the character assassination.

load more comments
view more: next ›