Self hosting isn't a solution to replace off site storage.
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
520 points (98.0% liked)
Privacy
31934 readers
704 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
You can selfhost Syncthing without having a server, using your daily devices.
Which is great, but still does nothing for off-site storage.
You always have at least one off site backup of anything important. For most people, that's going to be some kind of cloud service. What you use to access that can vary a good bit (as someone reminded me, nextcloud services you can use rather than have it all be on site exist), but syncthing would require that you have someone else willing to have a device at their house, always connected, for it to be a viable pick this that aspect.
Don't get me wrong, syncthing is awesome, but it isn't a total solution by itself. Hell, my redundant off site backup is less hassle, tbh. I just swap out external drives when I visit my best friend. I take the most updated one, leave it and bring home the previous one from his place. It's always a little behind, but it isn't reliant on connectivity lol.
That's what I was getting at. If all of your backups are at the same place, physically, you don't actually have backups, you just have redundant copies. A backup that can be destroyed at the same time as other backups or the original isn't really a backup at all. It's good enough for a drive dying, but not for bigger events.
That's what I was getting at, I just forgot that nexcloud services exist.
Your smartphone is already an always connected device, and you can manually do periodical backups on external drives which is a good practice in any case.
You can also set which device rules the file modification (sent or receive only as a folder).
I think it's ok for most of the people. If you have a tons of precious files to save I can agree with you, but I think this type of "off-grid self-hosting" is just the future of personal data management.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Good thing I got rid of my Dropbox years ago.
It's almost 2024 and we still don't have any significant open source project for cloud storage privacy.