this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
1331 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59201 readers
3184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Thanks to Popcrave https://twitter.com/popcrave/status/1691852136236327316?s=46&t=lcH0dp9biwkMEBKsRQeVeQ

Who here is going to put their ID and photo on X/Twitter

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] steve228uk@lemmy.world 641 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Nobody, absolutely nobody should trust that idiot with your ID.

[–] pizza-bagel@kbin.social 276 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you always wanted to leak your ID to a bunch of hackers thanks to poor security practices, this is a great opportunity for you to do so

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 132 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Leak? Hackers? None of that effort will be necessary, Elon will sell this data for dirt cheap in a few weeks.

His entire goal is trying to extract as much money as fast as possible and then bail out. He was forced to buy Twitter for that obscene price - everything he's been doing since then is trying to lose as little money as possible from this ordeal.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago (4 children)

then is trying to lose as little money as possible from this ordeal

Bro he could have just bought it and done nothing and he would have been better off. I don't have the same read that you do. My read is that he had specific strategic political interests in buying it and the money/ value/ revenue shit is secondary.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mister_monster@monero.town 66 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's not about trusting some idiot. It's about attaching your identity to your activities online. I remember when these websites used to advise against doxing yourself.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah. I'd rather hand it over to the weird guy at the bus stop. At least he's not a billionaire douche bag.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 334 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Twitter aside, if any website or app ever asks this of you, please nope the fuck out.

[–] sab@kbin.social 115 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I guess it only occasionally makes sense for government web sites and banks. X might have ambitions to become a bank, so in that sense it might make sense.

So another piece of advice: if twitter ever asks you if you want to start using it for banking, nope the fuck out.

[–] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

You Americans should get to this century and start performing digital strong authentications like the rest of us. Sending picture of your ID to anyone is insane :)

How we do it here in Finland is that there are digital identity providers which use bank/mobile carrier to identify you. They then use MFA when identifying you. Any service can use these services to do strong authentication for you. And they don't cost anything for the customer, and is really cheap for the company who wants to identify you. It is also build into the law that you must identify people using these, to avoid identity theft.

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 96 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're still trying to decide if slavery was wrong give us some time

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 226 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Don't do this. Delete your Xitter account and use Mastodon instead.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 99 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Xitter

In my head that's pronounced "shitter"

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

That is indeed my intent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 165 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

90s: stay anonymous, be careful with strangers, don't give up any more info than you have to. The internet can be a dangerous place. Also, supervise your kids and have them ask permission to go online.

2010s-2020s: livestream your life 24/7, use real names and emails everywhere when signing up for bullshit, hand your kid a phone and let them go buck wild as well.

How did we stray like this?

[–] Lowburn@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's also ironic that the same generation of parents telling us to be careful online and "don't believe everything you see on TV" are the same ones that get their news from grifter pundits and divisive facebook memes generated by Russian bot farms.

[–] emogu@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

It’s remarkable isn’t it? Now we’re the ones telling our parents to turn off the TV and get off the internet or it’ll rot their brains.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 141 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I, for one, want to thank Elon Musk for graciously backing up my highly sensitive government ID (that has my birthdate, eye color, height, weight), my biometric data, and likeness! It is such a nice thing to centralize all my most sensitive data into one giant honeypot waiting to meltdown. It is made even more appealing after he fired the entire staff responsible for maintaining this honeypot!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 120 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Looking forward to the inevitable massive data breach.

[–] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Will be even more interesting when they inevitably hold the data for longer than the 30 days

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (10 children)

There is absolutely 0 chance I'm sending any documents to the clown in chief

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 95 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Man, Elon's got one hell of a boner for WeChat, huh? I honestly feel embarassed for him. WeChat is WeChat because it's Chinese -- there is no secret formula for Elon to steal. The circumstances which created WeChat simply do not exist in the west and IMO it should stay that way.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 82 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Nobody noticed “Be prepared to take a sefie” !?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Merulox@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (4 children)

it won't be mandatory, unfortunately. Would've loved to see another fediverse mass migration

[–] gabe 34 points 1 year ago (11 children)

The eternal september moment for the fediverse is very much coming

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Levsgetso@lemmy.zip 81 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ah yes, just take a photo of your id. Surely X can be trusted, right… right guys?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure it can. Just wait 'til it also becomes your banking app, keeping your money totally safe, then you'll be able to double trust it. Would space karen x ever lie to anyone? /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Online banks use this method. I am not happy with this either. It's government-regulated, so OK (sort of).

A social media site? No, thank you.

[–] dejf@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Banks are usually bound by KYC (know your customer) laws and are required to verify your identity. Imagine trusting some random third-party company with your photo ID though... Insane.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] couragethebravedog@lemmy.ml 70 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exciting times for hackers !

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean if you want your identity to be stolen, theres other equally fast ways

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Hahahahaha no.

Besides, what makes them think I even have a government ID? I don't drive and I'd only need a passport if I had to leave the country.

Looooooooots of people don't have ID.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 year ago (8 children)

In america maybe. In lots of other countries every adult has an ID

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Looooooooots of people don’t have ID.

In the civilized world, this is pretty endemic to your country and is actually a problem there as I understand.

Personally, where I live, I couldn't even vote or reliably buy alcohol if I didn't have some form of ID to prove my identity or age (okay, I haven't been carded in years, but it COULD happen). This is OK because everyone is mandated to have ID anyway (and it's not in any way difficult to get one), so requiring ID for voting, for an example, doesn't discriminate against poor people like in the US.

That said, X still wouldn't get my ID. I haven't even given it to Google, despite them asking me for it so I could watch music videos with a lil bit of swearing or something (Funny thing being, my YouTube account is about old enough that in a year or 2 it can go buy beer here in the EU)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] noodle@feddit.uk 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I am going to continue not having an account and not having to deal with this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

Normalizing proving who you are to random online companies. I can't see how this could backfire.

[–] sugarfree@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why would anybody do this?

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That’s literally what I thought about installing Chrome and sharing my browsing history with Google. Why would I get a Facebook account and share my name, my face and my daily activities with the entire world. I thought that this is just pure insanity, and nobody will ever go along with this level of stupidity. Oh, boy was I in for a surprise.

Look who is laughing now that Chrome is the number one browser and many websites are only tested on Chrome. FB has so many users that people think it’s really odd that I’m not there with everyone else.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nul_user@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Au10tix

I wonder if Elon demanded they use this company for identity verification because of their creative use of the letter X

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Too bad Twitter didn't already have a fully-functional identity verification system 6 months ago, which didn't require the exposure of any sensitive PII. Would be crazy if that had been a thing, eh?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rearsays@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago

I genuinely don’t care about pretty much every other piece of drama related to X but I won’t be giving any social media or my government issued ID that won’t be happening.

[–] highseas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 year ago

Commence operation dick pic

[–] ox0r@jlai.lu 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Humor is now legal on twitter!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kjatten@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was already failing, now it's just going overkill.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›