this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
439 points (96.2% liked)

Memes

45725 readers
1026 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Ehhhh, no. There are very important reasons we divide the time this way. 24 is a highly composite number (a number with more divisors than all numbers preceding it; like an opposite of a prime number). This allows us to easily divide the day into halves, thirds, quarters and sixths. So is 60, with even more divisors.

My guess is the same thing goes for the switch from Roman to Julian calendar (ten to twelve months in a year).

Interestingly, the same goes for 360 degrees in a full angle.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The history of the calendar in Roman times is actually an entire topic to itself.

The pre-Julian calendar required fine tuning every year in winter to keep the rest of the months aligned with the seasons.

Technically not a difficult job to keep the calendar running smoothly and consistently, but the person in charge of the calendar in Rome was a politician, so they would play political games with the length of the year.

Caesar wanted a calendar that would run on auto-pilot to strip power away from those politicians.

By sheer coincidence when Caesar made his reform, during the the changeover of calendars while he was in charge, he got to rule over a 400+ day long year.

[–] Misconduct@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ahhh. This is it. This is the good stuff. Lemmy is really coming along I missed this.

[–] xx3r@lemmy.studio 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We should have a base 12 metric system but the French already established the 10

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The inventor of the imperial units used by the US, this one really sniffed glue.

[–] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I'm with you on metric vs. standard units all day, it's downright embarrassing that we still haven't switched to metric...but Month, Day, Year makes far more sense. The numerical day of the month is pointless by itself, there are 12 of each number (except 29-31) every year so the number says nothing at all without the context. It makes no sense to start reciting a date with the least important and least descriptive bit of information. The month is the piece of information that gives the most detail on its own and cuts down on the number of words to say the date. Instead of "The 12th of May" we just say "May 12th" cutting two completely unnecessary words from British English. It also lets you know the season of the year right off the bat. If we ask when a movie, game, or book is coming out, "in March" is the best way to say it if you had to choose only one piece of data of the three. "This year/Next year" or "the 25th" give less info. We leave off the year if the future event is in the current year so that comes last naturally. As objectively as possible, we improved the date format.

[–] holgersson@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: be consequential and go from most generic to most specific with year-month-day.

If something is obviously in the current year, just leave the year part.

[–] BouncyBling@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe we could make a standard out of this...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is why it should always be yyyy/mm/dd

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ELLIOTTCABLE@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

When I was a kid, I was such a nerd, that I invented my own decimal timekeeping system.

Even wrote a little macOS menubar clock for it — I was dead-serious.

Edit: omg the website still works, even though I never put any real content there …

http://yreality.net/UJD/

Edit 2: Found this old explanation I apparently put together in July 2010, according to my image archive:

[–] SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

That's pretty cool! The French actually had a decimal time system after the revolution, but they eventually abandoned it.

[–] paulchartres@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay but now you have to tell us how it works!

[–] kambusha@feddit.ch 10 points 1 year ago

All I can gather, is that the number furthest to the right seems to be 100ms, so the second digit from the right is counting seconds. When those 3 digits reach 000, they've counted 100 seconds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hglman@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reason for 12-hour clocks is most cultures worldwide have variable length hours of over a year. For Western times this comes from Greeks who had 12 day and 12 night hours. Early water clocks in antiquity would attempt to make that adjustment automatically.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It came from the Sumerians, not the Greeks.

[–] hglman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The Greeks specifically build water clocks with variable length days.

[–] Arigion@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait until you hear about traditional Japanese timekeeping, where the hours had different lengths throughout the year, depending on daylight: https://youtu.be/1BJmnEa6YGE

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 8 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/1BJmnEa6YGE

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

The Greeks also had variable length hours, and early water clocks attempted to adjust automatically over the year.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We should just use second notation for everything.

I’ll be there in 5 min? I’ll be there in 2 or 3 hundo!

See you tommorow? See you in in 86K!

Next week? About half a Megasec!

Doesn’t Megasecond sound better than Fortnite?

[–] Vithar@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a fun fun sci-fi book called "Deepness in the Sky" by Vernor Vinge. The Humans use epoch time with si prefixed Seconds for time,

[–] electrorocket@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That is a great book. Did you read the sequels?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also each part of the world will offset by half an hour or so.

Also military will operate by a 24 hrs.

Also fuck you

Military plus all of mainland Europe

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, if military and show up late, fuck you, you're fired. Which I'm actually OK with.

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Dishonourable discharge, go back to your family that misses and loves you

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

The joys of a base-60 number system

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man I just want everyone to use UTC

[–] Volodymyr@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Time zones are kind of useful though.

[–] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

"The day will start when the sun comes up?" No, when the sun is the furthest away it can be from us.

[–] dullbananas@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Why hasn't the Metric world found a better way? I want a clock based around multiples of 10, dammit!

[–] mlfh@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago (12 children)

One benefit of base 12 and base 60 over base 10 for everyday use with things like time is simple factorization. You can divide 12 hours evenly into halves, thirds, quarters, and sixths, and 60 minutes evenly into halves, thirds, quarters, fifths, sixths, tenths, etc. With base 10, you've just got halves and fifths.

[–] kvn@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Another benefit of base 12 is that you can count to 12 easily with one hand by using your thumb to count each of the 3 segments on your 4 fingers.

I learned that on that other website prior to the great migration and it blew my mind then.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

tries it

Whoa. Dude that's super useful.

[–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm trying to think of a situation where I need to count to 12 on one hand 🤔

This would be useful if I was used to counting with base 12.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] static_motion@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Wait until you find out that binary counting allows you to count to 31 with one hand.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because base ten sucks for practical use and anything that needs division.

[–] exu@feditown.com 2 points 1 year ago

So hex time it is!

[–] mlc894@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Some people briefly tried that during the French Revolution, but it never caught on.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It was called the French Republican Calendar. Didn’t last very long.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Republican_calendar

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marduk@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chad American broken clocks: right twice per day Virgin Bri‘ish broken clocks: only right once per day

pwnd

load more comments (1 replies)

Oh and when the minute hand is 3/4s of the way to the 12 it's quarter too...5.

[–] xep@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GarlicBender@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Tonne? You mean megagram?

load more comments
view more: next ›